<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
        <title>Abdominal — NAEOTOM Connect</title>
        <link>https://connect.siemens-healthineers.com/ja/</link>
        <pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2026 15:10:08 +0000</pubDate>
        <language>ja</language>
            <description>Abdominal — NAEOTOM Connect</description>
    <atom:link href="https://connect.siemens-healthineers.com/ja/discussions/tagged/abdominal/feed.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
        <title>(2022) Lennartz | Virtual unenhanced images show limitations for adrenal adenoma characterization</title>
        <link>https://connect.siemens-healthineers.com/ja/discussion/486/2022-lennartz-virtual-unenhanced-images-show-limitations-for-adrenal-adenoma-characterization</link>
        <pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2026 17:27:06 +0000</pubDate>
        <category>Publication protocols</category>
        <dc:creator>Daniel Stromer</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">486@/ja/discussions</guid>
        <description><![CDATA[<div><div><p>PCCT-derived virtual unenhanced (VUE) images showed no significant difference in mean attenuation compared with true unenhanced (TUE) images for adrenal adenomas (9.2 ± 8.6 HU vs 7.3 ± 8.4 HU; P = .07).</p><p><br />
Despite similar mean values, individual VUE measurements showed both over- and underestimation, resulting in 10 of 36 adrenal adenomas being misclassified when the conventional 10-HU threshold was applied to VUE images.</p><p><br />
Material decomposition was tissue dependent: VUE underestimated attenuation in muscle and the portal vein while overestimating fat attenuation, indicating that further technical optimization is required before VUE can reliably replace TUE imaging for adrenal adenoma assessment.</p></div></div><p><a href="https://connect.siemens-healthineers.com/ja/home/leaving?allowTrusted=1&amp;target=https%3A%2F%2Fpubs.rsna.org%2Fdoi%2F10.1148%2Fradiol.220919" rel="nofollow noopener ugc" role="button">Access publication</a></p><p></p><span data-embedjson="{&quot;url&quot;:&quot;https:\/\/us.v-cdn.net\/6038601\/uploads\/JQ64337ELDFY\/image.png&quot;,&quot;name&quot;:&quot;image.png&quot;,&quot;type&quot;:&quot;image\/png&quot;,&quot;size&quot;:1288466,&quot;width&quot;:2000,&quot;height&quot;:1150,&quot;displaySize&quot;:&quot;large&quot;,&quot;float&quot;:&quot;none&quot;,&quot;downloadUrl&quot;:&quot;https:\/\/connect.siemens-healthineers.com\/api\/v2\/media\/download-by-url?url=https%3A%2F%2Fus.v-cdn.net%2F6038601%2Fuploads%2FJQ64337ELDFY%2Fimage.png&quot;,&quot;active&quot;:true,&quot;mediaID&quot;:1656,&quot;dateInserted&quot;:&quot;2026-08-27T17:25:46+00:00&quot;,&quot;insertUserID&quot;:14,&quot;foreignType&quot;:null,&quot;foreignID&quot;:null,&quot;embedType&quot;:&quot;image&quot;,&quot;embedStyle&quot;:&quot;rich_embed_card&quot;}">
    <span>
        <a href="https://connect.siemens-healthineers.com/ja/home/leaving?allowTrusted=1&amp;target=https%3A%2F%2Fus.v-cdn.net%2F6038601%2Fuploads%2FJQ64337ELDFY%2Fimage.png" rel="nofollow noopener ugc" target="_blank">
            <img src="https://us.v-cdn.net/6038601/uploads/JQ64337ELDFY/image.png" alt="image.png" height="1150" width="2000" data-display-size="large" data-float="none" data-type="image/png" data-embed-type="image" srcset="https://us.v-cdn.net/cdn-cgi/image/quality=80, format=auto, fit=scale-down, height=300, width=300/6038601/uploads/JQ64337ELDFY/image.png 300w, https://us.v-cdn.net/cdn-cgi/image/quality=80, format=auto, fit=scale-down, height=600, width=600/6038601/uploads/JQ64337ELDFY/image.png 600w, https://us.v-cdn.net/cdn-cgi/image/quality=80, format=auto, fit=scale-down, height=800, width=800/6038601/uploads/JQ64337ELDFY/image.png 800w, https://us.v-cdn.net/cdn-cgi/image/quality=80, format=auto, fit=scale-down, height=1200, width=1200/6038601/uploads/JQ64337ELDFY/image.png 1200w, https://us.v-cdn.net/cdn-cgi/image/quality=80, format=auto, fit=scale-down, height=1600, width=1600/6038601/uploads/JQ64337ELDFY/image.png 1600w, https://us.v-cdn.net/cdn-cgi/image/quality=80, format=auto, fit=scale-down, height=2000, width=2000/6038601/uploads/JQ64337ELDFY/image.png 2000w, https://us.v-cdn.net/6038601/uploads/JQ64337ELDFY/image.png" sizes="100vw" /></a>
    </span>
</span>
<p><strong>Figure 2. </strong>Case examples for photon-counting detector CT–derived images in adrenal adenoma. Left column: Axial true unenhanced (TUE) images. Middle column: Virtual unenhanced (VUE) images. Right column: Corresponding contrast-enhanced portal venous phase images. (A–C) Images in a 79-year-old woman with lipid-rich adenoma of the left adrenal gland. VUE images led to overestimation of adrenal gland attenuation, which hampered correct classification as lipid-rich adenoma using the 10-HU threshold. (D–F) Images in a 65-year-old woman with lipid-rich adenoma in the left adrenal gland. Classification based on VUE images was in concordance with classification based on TUE images, albeit with a slight overestimation of attenuation on VUE images. (G–I) Images in a 79-year-old woman with lipid-poor adenoma in the left adrenal gland show high contrast material enhancement. VUE images led to 12-HU underestimation when compared with TUE attenuation, which would still result in the correct classification.</p><p></p><h2 data-id="protocol">Protocol</h2><div><table><colgroup><col /><col /><col /></colgroup><tr><th><p><strong>Detail</strong></p></th><th><p><strong>Value</strong></p></th></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Scanner</strong></p></td><td><p>NAEOTOM Alpha</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Scan area</strong></p></td><td><p>Abdomen / adrenal glands</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Scan mode</strong></p></td><td><p>True unenhanced + portal venous phase</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Acquisition mode</strong></p></td><td><p>QunatumPlus</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Tube voltage [kV]</strong></p></td><td><p>120</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Effective mAs [mAs]</strong></p></td><td><p>Automated exposure control</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>IQ level</strong></p></td><td><p>170</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Pitch</strong></p></td><td><p>0.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Rotation time [s]</strong></p></td><td><p>0.25–0.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Detector slice collimation</strong></p></td><td><p>144 × 0.4 mm</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Slice thickness</strong></p></td><td><p>2 mm</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Matrix</strong></p></td><td><p>512 × 512</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Iterative reconstruction</strong></p></td><td><p>QIR 4</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Reconstruction</strong></p></td><td><p>Axial</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Material decomposition</strong></p></td><td><p>VUE reconstructed from portal venous phase</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Contrast agent</strong></p></td><td><p>Accupaque 300</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Contrast phase</strong></p></td><td><p>Portal venous</p></td></tr></table></div><p></p><h2 data-id="key-results">Key Results</h2><div><table><colgroup><col /><col /><col /></colgroup><tr><th><p><strong>Parameter</strong></p></th><th><p><strong>Main finding</strong></p></th></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Study population</strong></p></td><td><p>29 patients, 36 adrenal adenomas</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>VUE vs TUE attenuation</strong></p></td><td><p>9.2 ± 8.6 vs 7.3 ± 8.4 HU; <strong>P = .07</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>10-HU classification</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>10/36 adenomas misclassified</strong> using VUE</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Lipid-rich adenomas</strong></p></td><td><p>23/36</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Lipid-poor adenomas</strong></p></td><td><p>13/36</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Tissue dependence</strong></p></td><td><p>VUE underestimated muscle/portal vein and overestimated fat attenuation</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Clinical implication</strong></p></td><td><p>VUE cannot yet reliably substitute for TUE when applying the conventional 10-HU threshold</p></td></tr></table></div><p><strong>Source:</strong> Lennartz S, Schoenbeck D, Kröger JR, Borggrefe J, Niehoff JH. <em>Photon-counting CT Material Decomposition: Initial Experience in Assessing Adrenal Adenoma.</em> Radiology. 2023;306(1):202–204. doi:10.1148/radiol.220919. </p>]]>
        </description>
    </item>
    <item>
        <title>(2025) Zhang | UHR PCCT versus 40-keV VMI for abdominal artery visualization</title>
        <link>https://connect.siemens-healthineers.com/ja/discussion/497/2025-zhang-uhr-pcct-versus-40-kev-vmi-for-abdominal-artery-visualization</link>
        <pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2026 10:20:38 +0000</pubDate>
        <category>Publication protocols</category>
        <dc:creator>Daniel Stromer</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">497@/ja/discussions</guid>
        <description><![CDATA[<div><div><p>This prospective study compared 0.2-mm ultra-high-resolution (UHR) PCCT with 1-mm standard-resolution 40-keV VMI for abdominal CTA in 94 participants, equally divided between full-dose and low-dose protocols. Standard-resolution 40-keV VMI provided significantly higher SNR and CNR than all UHR reconstructions.</p><p><br />
UHR reconstruction nevertheless improved vessel sharpness, particularly with the sharper Bv56 and Bv60 kernels, but the associated increase in image noise reduced overall image quality. The smoother Bv48 UHR reconstruction provided the best balance, with overall quality comparable to standard-resolution 40-keV VMI.</p><p><br />
Importantly, abdominal artery visibility was broadly comparable across full- and low-dose reconstructions. The authors therefore favor 1-mm low-dose 40-keV VMI for routine abdominal CTA, while 0.2-mm UHR Bv48 may be valuable when very thin slices and visualization of distal vascular segments are specifically required.</p></div></div><p><a href="https://connect.siemens-healthineers.com/ja/home/leaving?allowTrusted=1&amp;target=https%3A%2F%2Flink.springer.com%2Farticle%2F10.1007%2Fs10278-024-01232-5" rel="nofollow noopener ugc" role="button">Access publication</a></p><span data-embedjson="{&quot;url&quot;:&quot;https:\/\/us.v-cdn.net\/6038601\/uploads\/F16FLZLMS4P4\/image.png&quot;,&quot;name&quot;:&quot;image.png&quot;,&quot;type&quot;:&quot;image\/png&quot;,&quot;size&quot;:580375,&quot;width&quot;:1000,&quot;height&quot;:575,&quot;displaySize&quot;:&quot;large&quot;,&quot;float&quot;:&quot;none&quot;,&quot;downloadUrl&quot;:&quot;https:\/\/connect.siemens-healthineers.com\/api\/v2\/media\/download-by-url?url=https%3A%2F%2Fus.v-cdn.net%2F6038601%2Fuploads%2FF16FLZLMS4P4%2Fimage.png&quot;,&quot;active&quot;:true,&quot;mediaID&quot;:1674,&quot;dateInserted&quot;:&quot;2026-08-28T10:19:58+00:00&quot;,&quot;insertUserID&quot;:14,&quot;foreignType&quot;:null,&quot;foreignID&quot;:null,&quot;embedType&quot;:&quot;image&quot;,&quot;embedStyle&quot;:&quot;rich_embed_card&quot;}">
    <span>
        <a href="https://connect.siemens-healthineers.com/ja/home/leaving?allowTrusted=1&amp;target=https%3A%2F%2Fus.v-cdn.net%2F6038601%2Fuploads%2FF16FLZLMS4P4%2Fimage.png" rel="nofollow noopener ugc" target="_blank">
            <img src="https://us.v-cdn.net/6038601/uploads/F16FLZLMS4P4/image.png" alt="image.png" height="575" width="1000" data-display-size="large" data-float="none" data-type="image/png" data-embed-type="image" srcset="https://us.v-cdn.net/cdn-cgi/image/quality=80, format=auto, fit=scale-down, height=300, width=300/6038601/uploads/F16FLZLMS4P4/image.png 300w, https://us.v-cdn.net/cdn-cgi/image/quality=80, format=auto, fit=scale-down, height=600, width=600/6038601/uploads/F16FLZLMS4P4/image.png 600w, https://us.v-cdn.net/cdn-cgi/image/quality=80, format=auto, fit=scale-down, height=800, width=800/6038601/uploads/F16FLZLMS4P4/image.png 800w, https://us.v-cdn.net/cdn-cgi/image/quality=80, format=auto, fit=scale-down, height=1200, width=1200/6038601/uploads/F16FLZLMS4P4/image.png 1200w, https://us.v-cdn.net/cdn-cgi/image/quality=80, format=auto, fit=scale-down, height=1600, width=1600/6038601/uploads/F16FLZLMS4P4/image.png 1600w, https://us.v-cdn.net/cdn-cgi/image/quality=80, format=auto, fit=scale-down, height=2000, width=2000/6038601/uploads/F16FLZLMS4P4/image.png 2000w, https://us.v-cdn.net/6038601/uploads/F16FLZLMS4P4/image.png" sizes="100vw" /></a>
    </span>
</span>
<p><strong>Figure 5.</strong> Representative example of two participants who both underwent full-dose scan. A A 71-year man with a BMI of 19.7 kg/m2 underwent abdominal CTA using a FD protocol with CTDIvol, DLP, SSDE, and effective dose of 6.23 mGy, 212.0 mGy·cm, 9.06 mGy, and 3.18 mSv, respectively. The data were reconstructed into FD_UHR_Bv48, FD_UHR_Bv56, FD_UHR_Bv60, FD_SR_Bv40 images, respectively. The UHR images have higher image noise, but better vessel sharpness. The overall quality of FD_UHR_Bv48, and FD_SR_Bv40 images are comparable. The FD_UHR_Bv56 and FD_UHR_Bv60 images presented better vessel sharpness than but were damaged by higher image noise. B–D Another 57-year woman with a BMI of 20.8 kg/m.2 underwent abdominal CTA using a FD protocol with CTDIvol, DLP, SSDE, and effective dose of 4.06 mGy, 111.0 mGy·cm, 6.25 mGy, and 1.67 mSv, respectively. The data were reconstructed into FD_UHR_Bv48, and FD_SR_Bv40 images, respectively. B The left gastric artery is only visible in axial FD_UHR_Bv48 images (solid arrow), and the soft tissue between the abdominal aorta and celiac trunk were better depicted (open arrow). C There were more visible vascular segments of left renal artery in coronal FD_UHR_Bv48 images than FD_SR_Bv40 images (solid arrow). D The left renal artery can be better visualized to the more distal vascular segments in volume-rendered FD_UHR_Bv48 images than FD_SR_Bv40 images (solid arrow). The volume-rendered FD_UHR_Bv48 images allowed more visible vascular segments of superior mesenteric artery (open arrow).</p><p></p><h2 data-id="protocol">Protocol</h2><div><table><colgroup><col /><col /><col /></colgroup><tr><th><p><strong>Detail</strong></p></th><th><p><strong>Value</strong></p></th></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Scanner</strong></p></td><td><p>NAEOTOM Alpha</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Software</strong></p></td><td><p>Syngo.CT VA50-SP1; syngo.via VB60</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Scan area</strong></p></td><td><p>Abdominal CTA</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Scan mode</strong></p></td><td><p>UHR</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Acquisition mode</strong></p></td><td><p>PCCT</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Tube voltage [kV]</strong></p></td><td><p>120</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Effective mAs [mAs]</strong></p></td><td><p>CARE Dose4D automatic</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>IQ level</strong></p></td><td><p>145 full dose; 90 low dose</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Dose modulation</strong></p></td><td><p>CARE Dose4D</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>CTDIvol [mGy]</strong></p></td><td><p>Protocol-dependent; significantly lower with low-dose protocol</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>DLP [mGy·cm]</strong></p></td><td><p>Protocol-dependent; significantly lower with low-dose protocol</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Temporal resolution [ms]</strong></p></td><td><p>n.a.</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Rotation time [s]</strong></p></td><td><p>0.50</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Pitch</strong></p></td><td><p>0.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Matrix</strong></p></td><td><p>Automatically adjusted</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Field of view [mm]</strong></p></td><td><p>Automatically adjusted</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Detector slice collimation</strong></p></td><td><p>120 × 0.2 mm</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Acquisition slice thickness</strong></p></td><td><p>0.2 mm</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Slice width [mm]</strong></p></td><td><p>UHR: 0.2; SR: 1.0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Reconstruction increment [mm]</strong></p></td><td><p>UHR: 0.2; SR: 0.7</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Reconstruction kernel</strong></p></td><td><p>UHR: Bv48, Bv56, Bv60; SR: Bv40</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Iterative reconstruction</strong></p></td><td><p>UHR: QIR 4; SR: QIR 3</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Reconstruction</strong></p></td><td><p>UHR polychromatic vs standard-resolution 40-keV VMI</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Reconstruction comparison</strong></p></td><td><p>FD_UHR_Bv48, FD_UHR_Bv56, FD_UHR_Bv60, FD_SR_Bv40, LD_UHR_Bv48, LD_SR_Bv40</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Contrast agent</strong></p></td><td><p>Ultravist 370</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Contrast volume</strong></p></td><td><p>1.5 mL/kg</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Saline flush</strong></p></td><td><p>n.a.</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Injection rate</strong></p></td><td><p>3.0 mL/s</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Bolus triggering</strong></p></td><td><p>Abdominal aorta</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Arterial phase</strong></p></td><td><p>12-s delay after aortic enhancement</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Additional reconstructions</strong></p></td><td><p>Axial, coronal, volume-rendered images</p></td></tr></table></div><p></p><h2 data-id="key-results">Key Results</h2><div><table><colgroup><col /><col /><col /></colgroup><tr><th><p><strong>Parameter</strong></p></th><th><p><strong>Main finding</strong></p></th></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Study population</strong></p></td><td><p>94 participants; <strong>47 full dose + 47 low dose</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>SNR / CNR</strong></p></td><td><p>Significantly higher with <strong>1-mm 40-keV VMI</strong> than UHR, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Vessel sharpness</strong></p></td><td><p>Highest with <strong>UHR Bv56/Bv60</strong>, but with substantially more noise</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Best UHR balance</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>0.2-mm Bv48</strong> provided comparable overall quality to 40-keV VMI</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Artery visibility</strong></p></td><td><p>No significant overall difference among the six reconstruction series</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Preferred strategy</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Low-dose 1-mm 40-keV VMI</strong> for routine CTA; <strong>0.2-mm UHR Bv48</strong> when thinner slices are required</p></td></tr></table></div><p><strong>Source:</strong><br />
Zhang H, Xing Y, Wang L, Hu Y, Xu Z, Chen H, Lu J, Yang J, Ding B, Hu W, Zhong J. <em>Ultra-High-Resolution Photon-Counting Detector CT Benefits Visualization of Abdominal Arteries: A Comparison to Standard-Reconstruction.</em> <strong>Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine.</strong> 2025;38:1891–1903. doi:10.1007/s10278-024-01232-5.</p>]]>
        </description>
    </item>
    <item>
        <title>(2024) Wang | Low-dose ultra-high-resolution PCCT for visceral artery CTA</title>
        <link>https://connect.siemens-healthineers.com/ja/discussion/496/2024-wang-low-dose-ultra-high-resolution-pcct-for-visceral-artery-cta</link>
        <pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2026 10:12:50 +0000</pubDate>
        <category>Scientific publications</category>
        <dc:creator>Daniel Stromer</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">496@/ja/discussions</guid>
        <description><![CDATA[<div><div><p>Prospective study testing whether low-dose (LD) ultra-high-resolution (UHR) photon-counting CT can preserve diagnostic image quality for visceral artery CTA. The study included 57 patients in the full-dose group and 57 in the low-dose group.</p><p><br />
Each acquisition was reconstructed two ways: 0.2 mm / Bv48 / QIR 4 and 1 mm / Bv40 / QIR 3. Objective SNR/CNR and subjective noise, vessel sharpness, overall quality, and visibility of nine visceral arteries were assessed.</p><p><br />
The 0.2-mm UHR reconstruction had lower SNR and CNR than the 1-mm reconstruction, but nevertheless achieved better qualitative image quality, particularly for depiction of tiny arteries on volume-rendered images (p &lt; 0.001).</p><p><br />
Importantly, full-dose imaging generally did not provide significantly higher SNR/CNR than low-dose imaging at the same slice thickness. Exceptions were SNR for the common hepatic, splenic, and bilateral renal arteries with the 0.2-mm reconstruction.</p><p><br />
Low-dose scanning also did not significantly impair image quality in overweight patients within the same reconstruction setting.</p><p><br />
Visibility of the nine evaluated visceral arteries was largely comparable between full- and low-dose protocols, with limited exceptions involving the superior mesenteric and left gastric arteries.</p></div></div><p><a href="https://connect.siemens-healthineers.com/ja/home/leaving?allowTrusted=1&amp;target=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.academicradiology.org%2Farticle%2FS1076-6332%2824%2900430-6%2Fabstract" rel="nofollow noopener ugc" role="button">Access publication</a></p><p><br /><strong>Practical PCCT takeaway</strong></p><p>The study supports using low-dose UHR PCCT for visceral CTA while retaining very thin 0.2-mm reconstructions. Rather than sacrificing spatial resolution to improve conventional SNR/CNR metrics, UHR PCCT can exploit thin slices to improve depiction of small arterial anatomy. The authors conclude that low-dose UHR was adequate for clinical visceral-artery evaluation and that 0.2-mm reconstruction particularly improves small-vessel depiction.</p><p></p><p><strong>Protocol</strong></p><p>NAEOTOM Alpha PCCT; UHR acquisition; 57 FD + 57 LD patients; 0.2-mm/Bv48/QIR4 versus 1-mm/Bv40/QIR3 reconstructions.</p><p></p><p>Source: Wang L, Hu Y, Zhong J, et al. Low-dose Ultra-high-resolution Photon-Counting Detector CT for Visceral Artery CT Angiography: A Preliminary Study. Academic Radiology. 2024;31(12):5087–5099. doi:10.1016/j.acra.2024.06.044. Published online August 6, 2024.</p>]]>
        </description>
    </item>
    <item>
        <title>(2023) Schade | Pseudoenhancement of renal cysts on PCCT</title>
        <link>https://connect.siemens-healthineers.com/ja/discussion/495/2023-schade-pseudoenhancement-of-renal-cysts-on-pcct</link>
        <pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2026 10:10:05 +0000</pubDate>
        <category>Scientific publications</category>
        <dc:creator>Daniel Stromer</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">495@/ja/discussions</guid>
        <description><![CDATA[<div><div><p>In 86 patients with 160 non-enhancing renal cysts, the study assessed how PCCT virtual monoenergetic image (VMI) energy level affects apparent renal cyst enhancement and therefore lesion classification.</p><p><br />
Low-keV VMI substantially increased apparent cyst attenuation: mean attenuation rose from 4 ± 11 HU at 190 keV to 36 ± 17 HU at 40 keV.</p><p><br />
This produced marked pseudoenhancement at low energies: at 40 keV, 35% of cysts appeared equivocally enhancing and 46% definitely enhancing; at 50 keV, these rates were 29% and 10%, respectively. At 60 keV, 9% were equivocal but none definitely enhancing.</p><p><br />
Importantly, no cyst was classified as enhancing at 70–190 keV, indicating that ≥70-keV VMI provides substantially more reliable assessment of true renal cyst enhancement.</p></div></div><p><a href="https://connect.siemens-healthineers.com/ja/home/leaving?allowTrusted=1&amp;target=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.academicradiology.org%2Farticle%2FS1076-6332%2823%2900187-3%2Fabstract" rel="nofollow noopener ugc" role="button">Access publication</a></p><p></p><p><strong>Practical PCCT takeaway: </strong></p><p>Low-keV reconstructions are attractive for increasing iodine conspicuity, but they should not be used uncritically for HU-based renal lesion characterization. For renal cyst enhancement, 70 keV appears to be a safer reference reconstruction in this study.</p><p>The observed misclassification was not significantly dependent on cyst size, location, or patient BMI, suggesting that the VMI energy itself is the dominant issue.</p><p><strong>Protocol:</strong> </p><p>Clinical PCCT, 120 kVp, image-quality level 68; triphasic examination. Venous-phase VMIs were reconstructed from 40–190 keV in 10-keV increments. Only cysts ≥7 mm confirmed as non-enhancing (&lt;10 HU difference between unenhanced and venous 70-keV images) were analyzed.</p><p>Source: Schade KA, Mergen V, Sartoretti T, Alkadhi H, Euler A. Pseudoenhancement in Cystic Renal Lesions – Impact of Virtual Monoenergetic Images of Photon-Counting Detector CT on Lesion Classification. Academic Radiology. 2023;30(Suppl 1):S305-S313. doi:10.1016/j.acra.2023.04.005. Published online May 5, 2023.</p>]]>
        </description>
    </item>
    <item>
        <title>(2026) Huang | UHR PCCT with low-keV improves preoperative pancreatic cancer assessment</title>
        <link>https://connect.siemens-healthineers.com/ja/discussion/489/2026-huang-uhr-pcct-with-low-kev-improves-preoperative-pancreatic-cancer-assessment</link>
        <pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2026 06:11:40 +0000</pubDate>
        <category>Scientific publications</category>
        <dc:creator>Daniel Stromer</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">489@/ja/discussions</guid>
        <description><![CDATA[<div><div><p>Combining UHR PCCT with low-keV virtual monoenergetic imaging (VMI) improved visualization of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), peripancreatic vessels, and fine pancreatic anatomy; the study identified 0.4-mm slices at 45 keV as the best overall reconstruction strategy for preoperative assessment.</p><p><br />
40-keV VMI produced the highest quantitative CNR and SNR for tumors and peripancreatic vessels, while 45–50 keV at 0.4-mm slice thickness achieved better qualitative visualization of fine anatomical structures, balancing spectral contrast enhancement with the high spatial resolution of PCCT.</p><p><br />
The combination of high spatial resolution and spectral information from PCCT may improve tumor–vessel delineation and visualization of fine structures relevant to PDAC staging and surgical planning, demonstrating the complementary value of UHR acquisition and spectral reconstruction in abdominal oncology imaging.</p></div></div><p><a href="https://connect.siemens-healthineers.com/ja/home/leaving?allowTrusted=1&amp;target=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.sciencedirect.com%2Fscience%2Farticle%2Fabs%2Fpii%2FS0720048X25006825" rel="nofollow noopener ugc" role="button">Access publication</a></p><span data-embedjson="{&quot;url&quot;:&quot;https:\/\/us.v-cdn.net\/6038601\/uploads\/8141ZA56ZYWA\/image.png&quot;,&quot;name&quot;:&quot;image.png&quot;,&quot;type&quot;:&quot;image\/png&quot;,&quot;size&quot;:298224,&quot;width&quot;:550,&quot;height&quot;:550,&quot;displaySize&quot;:&quot;medium&quot;,&quot;float&quot;:&quot;none&quot;,&quot;downloadUrl&quot;:&quot;https:\/\/connect.siemens-healthineers.com\/api\/v2\/media\/download-by-url?url=https%3A%2F%2Fus.v-cdn.net%2F6038601%2Fuploads%2F8141ZA56ZYWA%2Fimage.png&quot;,&quot;active&quot;:true,&quot;mediaID&quot;:1659,&quot;dateInserted&quot;:&quot;2026-08-28T06:10:50+00:00&quot;,&quot;insertUserID&quot;:14,&quot;foreignType&quot;:null,&quot;foreignID&quot;:null,&quot;embedType&quot;:&quot;image&quot;,&quot;embedStyle&quot;:&quot;rich_embed_card&quot;}">
    <span>
        <a href="https://connect.siemens-healthineers.com/ja/home/leaving?allowTrusted=1&amp;target=https%3A%2F%2Fus.v-cdn.net%2F6038601%2Fuploads%2F8141ZA56ZYWA%2Fimage.png" rel="nofollow noopener ugc" target="_blank">
            <img src="https://us.v-cdn.net/6038601/uploads/8141ZA56ZYWA/image.png" alt="image.png" height="550" width="550" data-display-size="medium" data-float="none" data-type="image/png" data-embed-type="image" srcset="https://us.v-cdn.net/cdn-cgi/image/quality=80, format=auto, fit=scale-down, height=300, width=300/6038601/uploads/8141ZA56ZYWA/image.png 300w, https://us.v-cdn.net/cdn-cgi/image/quality=80, format=auto, fit=scale-down, height=600, width=600/6038601/uploads/8141ZA56ZYWA/image.png 600w, https://us.v-cdn.net/cdn-cgi/image/quality=80, format=auto, fit=scale-down, height=800, width=800/6038601/uploads/8141ZA56ZYWA/image.png 800w, https://us.v-cdn.net/cdn-cgi/image/quality=80, format=auto, fit=scale-down, height=1200, width=1200/6038601/uploads/8141ZA56ZYWA/image.png 1200w, https://us.v-cdn.net/cdn-cgi/image/quality=80, format=auto, fit=scale-down, height=1600, width=1600/6038601/uploads/8141ZA56ZYWA/image.png 1600w, https://us.v-cdn.net/cdn-cgi/image/quality=80, format=auto, fit=scale-down, height=2000, width=2000/6038601/uploads/8141ZA56ZYWA/image.png 2000w, https://us.v-cdn.net/6038601/uploads/8141ZA56ZYWA/image.png" sizes="100vw" /></a>
    </span>
</span>
<p>Image taken from LinkedIn:</p><p>→ <a href="https://connect.siemens-healthineers.com/ja/home/leaving?allowTrusted=1&amp;target=https%3A%2F%2Flnkd.in%2Fp%2FdHEn3v4q" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener ugc">Go to post</a></p><p>Source: Huang R, Yang Y, Gao M, et al. Eur J Radiol. 2026;195:112596.</p>]]>
        </description>
    </item>
    <item>
        <title>(2022) Mergen | Virtual noncontrast abdominal imaging with PCCT</title>
        <link>https://connect.siemens-healthineers.com/ja/discussion/487/2022-mergen-virtual-noncontrast-abdominal-imaging-with-pcct</link>
        <pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2026 17:36:07 +0000</pubDate>
        <category>Publication protocols</category>
        <dc:creator>Daniel Stromer</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">487@/ja/discussions</guid>
        <description><![CDATA[<div><div><p>Virtual noncontrast (VNC) images reconstructed from contrast-enhanced PCCT provided accurate abdominal attenuation values compared with true noncontrast (TNC) imaging, supporting the potential to omit a separate TNC acquisition.</p><p><br />
Across all measurements, VNC attenuation errors were &lt;5 HU in 76% and &lt;10 HU in 95%; there was no meaningful overall difference between VNC reconstructed from arterial versus portal venous acquisitions.</p><p><br />
VNC had inferior image quality and higher/blotchier noise than TNC, but remained diagnostically usable in 99–100% of patients.</p></div></div><p><a href="https://connect.siemens-healthineers.com/ja/home/leaving?allowTrusted=1&amp;target=https%3A%2F%2Fpubs.rsna.org%2Fdoi%2F10.1148%2Fradiol.213260" rel="nofollow noopener ugc" role="button">Access publication</a></p><p></p><span data-embedjson="{&quot;url&quot;:&quot;https:\/\/us.v-cdn.net\/6038601\/uploads\/FZEKUMKR08AW\/image.png&quot;,&quot;name&quot;:&quot;image.png&quot;,&quot;type&quot;:&quot;image\/png&quot;,&quot;size&quot;:1376583,&quot;width&quot;:2000,&quot;height&quot;:1150,&quot;displaySize&quot;:&quot;large&quot;,&quot;float&quot;:&quot;none&quot;,&quot;downloadUrl&quot;:&quot;https:\/\/connect.siemens-healthineers.com\/api\/v2\/media\/download-by-url?url=https%3A%2F%2Fus.v-cdn.net%2F6038601%2Fuploads%2FFZEKUMKR08AW%2Fimage.png&quot;,&quot;active&quot;:true,&quot;mediaID&quot;:1657,&quot;dateInserted&quot;:&quot;2026-08-27T17:35:43+00:00&quot;,&quot;insertUserID&quot;:14,&quot;foreignType&quot;:null,&quot;foreignID&quot;:null,&quot;embedType&quot;:&quot;image&quot;,&quot;embedStyle&quot;:&quot;rich_embed_card&quot;}">
    <span>
        <a href="https://connect.siemens-healthineers.com/ja/home/leaving?allowTrusted=1&amp;target=https%3A%2F%2Fus.v-cdn.net%2F6038601%2Fuploads%2FFZEKUMKR08AW%2Fimage.png" rel="nofollow noopener ugc" target="_blank">
            <img src="https://us.v-cdn.net/6038601/uploads/FZEKUMKR08AW/image.png" alt="image.png" height="1150" width="2000" data-display-size="large" data-float="none" data-type="image/png" data-embed-type="image" srcset="https://us.v-cdn.net/cdn-cgi/image/quality=80, format=auto, fit=scale-down, height=300, width=300/6038601/uploads/FZEKUMKR08AW/image.png 300w, https://us.v-cdn.net/cdn-cgi/image/quality=80, format=auto, fit=scale-down, height=600, width=600/6038601/uploads/FZEKUMKR08AW/image.png 600w, https://us.v-cdn.net/cdn-cgi/image/quality=80, format=auto, fit=scale-down, height=800, width=800/6038601/uploads/FZEKUMKR08AW/image.png 800w, https://us.v-cdn.net/cdn-cgi/image/quality=80, format=auto, fit=scale-down, height=1200, width=1200/6038601/uploads/FZEKUMKR08AW/image.png 1200w, https://us.v-cdn.net/cdn-cgi/image/quality=80, format=auto, fit=scale-down, height=1600, width=1600/6038601/uploads/FZEKUMKR08AW/image.png 1600w, https://us.v-cdn.net/cdn-cgi/image/quality=80, format=auto, fit=scale-down, height=2000, width=2000/6038601/uploads/FZEKUMKR08AW/image.png 2000w, https://us.v-cdn.net/6038601/uploads/FZEKUMKR08AW/image.png" sizes="100vw" /></a>
    </span>
</span>
<p>Figure 2: CT attenuation measurements in a 58-year-old man referred for follow-up examination after an acute type B aortic dissection. Axial CT images acquired with photon-counting detector CT depict exemplary region-of-interest (ROI) measurements on venous virtual noncontrast reconstructions. avg = average attenuation within region of interest; d = diameter of region of interest.</p><p></p><h2 data-id="protocol">Protocol</h2><div><table><colgroup><col /><col /><col /></colgroup><tr><th><p><strong>Detail</strong></p></th><th><p><strong>Value</strong></p></th></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Scanner</strong></p></td><td><p>NAEOTOM Alpha</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Detector</strong></p></td><td><p>Dual-source, two cadmium telluride PCDs</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Scan area</strong></p></td><td><p>Thoracoabdominal</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Scan phases</strong></p></td><td><p>TNC + arterial + portal venous</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Acquisition mode</strong></p></td><td><p>Single-source multienergy, <strong>QuantumPlus</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Tube voltage [kV]</strong></p></td><td><p>120</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Tube current</strong></p></td><td><p>Automated modulation, CARE Dose4D / CARE kV</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>IQ level</strong></p></td><td><p>68</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Rotation time [s]</strong></p></td><td><p>0.25</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Pitch</strong></p></td><td><p>1.2</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Detector slice collimation</strong></p></td><td><p>144 × 0.4 mm</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Contrast</strong></p></td><td><p>70 mL iopromide, 370 mg I/mL</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Injection rate</strong></p></td><td><p>4 mL/s</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Arterial timing</strong></p></td><td><p>Bolus tracking; 140 HU threshold at 90 kV + 12-s delay</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Portal venous timing</strong></p></td><td><p>70 s after contrast injection</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Reconstruction kernel</strong></p></td><td><p>Br36</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Iterative reconstruction</strong></p></td><td><p>QIR 4</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Slice thickness [mm]</strong></p></td><td><p>2.0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Reconstruction increment [mm]</strong></p></td><td><p>1.6</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Reconstruction plane</strong></p></td><td><p>Axial</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>VNC source phases</strong></p></td><td><p>Arterial and portal venous</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Reference standard</strong></p></td><td><p>True noncontrast (TNC) images</p></td></tr></table></div><p></p><h2 data-id="key-results">Key Results</h2><div><table><colgroup><col /><col /><col /></colgroup><tr><th><p><strong>Parameter</strong></p></th><th><p><strong>Main finding</strong></p></th></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Study population</strong></p></td><td><p>100 patients; mean age 72 ± 10 years; 81 men</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Overall VNC error &lt;5 HU</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>76%</strong> of measurements</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Overall VNC error &lt;10 HU</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>95%</strong> of measurements</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Arterial vs venous VNC error</strong></p></td><td><p>3.3 vs 3.5 HU; <strong>P = .16</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Left liver attenuation error</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>1.4 ± 1.3 HU arterial VNC; 1.5 ± 1.2 HU venous VNC</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Liver error &lt;5 HU</strong></p></td><td><p>Left lobe <strong>99%</strong>; right lobe <strong>98%</strong> for both arterial and venous VNC</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Diagnostic subjective quality</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>99–100%</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>VNC noise</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>33% higher</strong> than TNC in phantom</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Noise texture</strong></p></td><td><p>VNC more blotchy; average spatial frequency <strong>0.14 vs 0.20 mm⁻¹</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Spatial resolution</strong></p></td><td><p>Similar overall; TTF50 <strong>0.29 mm⁻¹</strong> for both</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Detectability index</strong></p></td><td><p>VNC approximately <strong>15% lower</strong>, but always <strong>&gt;20</strong></p></td></tr></table></div><p>The liver showed particularly small VNC attenuation errors, with left-lobe mean errors around <strong>1.5 HU</strong>.  Phantom testing confirmed higher and blotchier VNC noise but similar middle-frequency spatial resolution and a detectability index consistently above 20. </p><p><strong>Take-home:</strong> PCCT VNC can provide quantitatively accurate abdominal attenuation without a dedicated noncontrast acquisition. The principal trade-off is higher, blotchier image noise and somewhat poorer subjective image quality, although diagnostic quality remained very high. </p><p><strong>Source:</strong> Mergen V, Racine D, Jungblut L, et al. <em>Virtual Noncontrast Abdominal Imaging with Photon-counting Detector CT.</em> <strong>Radiology.</strong> 2022;305(1):107–115. doi:10.1148/radiol.213260.</p>]]>
        </description>
    </item>
    <item>
        <title>(2024) Khanungwanitkul | PCCT reveals pancreatic duct connection of a side-branch IPMN</title>
        <link>https://connect.siemens-healthineers.com/ja/discussion/485/2024-khanungwanitkul-pcct-reveals-pancreatic-duct-connection-of-a-side-branch-ipmn</link>
        <pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2026 17:21:38 +0000</pubDate>
        <category>Case reports</category>
        <dc:creator>Daniel Stromer</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">485@/ja/discussions</guid>
        <description><![CDATA[<p></p><div><div><p>This case report has been published in Radiology.</p></div></div><p><a href="https://connect.siemens-healthineers.com/ja/home/leaving?allowTrusted=1&amp;target=https%3A%2F%2Fpubs.rsna.org%2Fdoi%2F10.1148%2Fradiol.240611" rel="nofollow noopener ugc" role="button">Access publication</a></p><p></p><span data-embedjson="{&quot;url&quot;:&quot;https:\/\/us.v-cdn.net\/6038601\/uploads\/ZKHKE0BYCA7L\/image.png&quot;,&quot;name&quot;:&quot;image.png&quot;,&quot;type&quot;:&quot;image\/png&quot;,&quot;size&quot;:2213773,&quot;width&quot;:2000,&quot;height&quot;:1150,&quot;displaySize&quot;:&quot;medium&quot;,&quot;float&quot;:&quot;none&quot;,&quot;downloadUrl&quot;:&quot;https:\/\/connect.siemens-healthineers.com\/api\/v2\/media\/download-by-url?url=https%3A%2F%2Fus.v-cdn.net%2F6038601%2Fuploads%2FZKHKE0BYCA7L%2Fimage.png&quot;,&quot;active&quot;:true,&quot;mediaID&quot;:1653,&quot;dateInserted&quot;:&quot;2026-08-27T17:18:09+00:00&quot;,&quot;insertUserID&quot;:14,&quot;foreignType&quot;:null,&quot;foreignID&quot;:null,&quot;embedType&quot;:&quot;image&quot;,&quot;embedStyle&quot;:&quot;rich_embed_card&quot;}">
    <span>
        <a href="https://connect.siemens-healthineers.com/ja/home/leaving?allowTrusted=1&amp;target=https%3A%2F%2Fus.v-cdn.net%2F6038601%2Fuploads%2FZKHKE0BYCA7L%2Fimage.png" rel="nofollow noopener ugc" target="_blank">
            <img src="https://us.v-cdn.net/6038601/uploads/ZKHKE0BYCA7L/image.png" alt="image.png" height="1150" width="2000" data-display-size="medium" data-float="none" data-type="image/png" data-embed-type="image" srcset="https://us.v-cdn.net/cdn-cgi/image/quality=80, format=auto, fit=scale-down, height=300, width=300/6038601/uploads/ZKHKE0BYCA7L/image.png 300w, https://us.v-cdn.net/cdn-cgi/image/quality=80, format=auto, fit=scale-down, height=600, width=600/6038601/uploads/ZKHKE0BYCA7L/image.png 600w, https://us.v-cdn.net/cdn-cgi/image/quality=80, format=auto, fit=scale-down, height=800, width=800/6038601/uploads/ZKHKE0BYCA7L/image.png 800w, https://us.v-cdn.net/cdn-cgi/image/quality=80, format=auto, fit=scale-down, height=1200, width=1200/6038601/uploads/ZKHKE0BYCA7L/image.png 1200w, https://us.v-cdn.net/cdn-cgi/image/quality=80, format=auto, fit=scale-down, height=1600, width=1600/6038601/uploads/ZKHKE0BYCA7L/image.png 1600w, https://us.v-cdn.net/cdn-cgi/image/quality=80, format=auto, fit=scale-down, height=2000, width=2000/6038601/uploads/ZKHKE0BYCA7L/image.png 2000w, https://us.v-cdn.net/6038601/uploads/ZKHKE0BYCA7L/image.png" sizes="100vw" /></a>
    </span>
</span>
<p><strong>Figure 1.</strong> Axial photon-counting CT images at (A) 0.4-mm, (C) 2-mm, and (D) 4-mm section thickness demonstrate an incidental hypoattenuating pancreatic lesion (arrowhead). The lesion communicates with the main pancreatic duct via a connection (arrow) visible at 0.4-mm section thickness. (B) Iodine overlay image at 0.4-mm section thickness displays iodine content in orange, demonstrating no uptake within the hypoattenuating lesion or main duct communication.</p><span data-embedjson="{&quot;url&quot;:&quot;https:\/\/us.v-cdn.net\/6038601\/uploads\/LQW7C1SVL1FR\/image.png&quot;,&quot;name&quot;:&quot;image.png&quot;,&quot;type&quot;:&quot;image\/png&quot;,&quot;size&quot;:890475,&quot;width&quot;:1000,&quot;height&quot;:734,&quot;displaySize&quot;:&quot;medium&quot;,&quot;float&quot;:&quot;none&quot;,&quot;downloadUrl&quot;:&quot;https:\/\/connect.siemens-healthineers.com\/api\/v2\/media\/download-by-url?url=https%3A%2F%2Fus.v-cdn.net%2F6038601%2Fuploads%2FLQW7C1SVL1FR%2Fimage.png&quot;,&quot;active&quot;:true,&quot;mediaID&quot;:1654,&quot;dateInserted&quot;:&quot;2026-08-27T17:20:43+00:00&quot;,&quot;insertUserID&quot;:14,&quot;foreignType&quot;:null,&quot;foreignID&quot;:null,&quot;embedType&quot;:&quot;image&quot;,&quot;embedStyle&quot;:&quot;rich_embed_card&quot;}">
    <span>
        <a href="https://connect.siemens-healthineers.com/ja/home/leaving?allowTrusted=1&amp;target=https%3A%2F%2Fus.v-cdn.net%2F6038601%2Fuploads%2FLQW7C1SVL1FR%2Fimage.png" rel="nofollow noopener ugc" target="_blank">
            <img src="https://us.v-cdn.net/6038601/uploads/LQW7C1SVL1FR/image.png" alt="image.png" height="734" width="1000" data-display-size="medium" data-float="none" data-type="image/png" data-embed-type="image" srcset="https://us.v-cdn.net/cdn-cgi/image/quality=80, format=auto, fit=scale-down, height=300, width=300/6038601/uploads/LQW7C1SVL1FR/image.png 300w, https://us.v-cdn.net/cdn-cgi/image/quality=80, format=auto, fit=scale-down, height=600, width=600/6038601/uploads/LQW7C1SVL1FR/image.png 600w, https://us.v-cdn.net/cdn-cgi/image/quality=80, format=auto, fit=scale-down, height=800, width=800/6038601/uploads/LQW7C1SVL1FR/image.png 800w, https://us.v-cdn.net/cdn-cgi/image/quality=80, format=auto, fit=scale-down, height=1200, width=1200/6038601/uploads/LQW7C1SVL1FR/image.png 1200w, https://us.v-cdn.net/cdn-cgi/image/quality=80, format=auto, fit=scale-down, height=1600, width=1600/6038601/uploads/LQW7C1SVL1FR/image.png 1600w, https://us.v-cdn.net/cdn-cgi/image/quality=80, format=auto, fit=scale-down, height=2000, width=2000/6038601/uploads/LQW7C1SVL1FR/image.png 2000w, https://us.v-cdn.net/6038601/uploads/LQW7C1SVL1FR/image.png" sizes="100vw" /></a>
    </span>
</span>
<p><strong>Figure 2. </strong>Coronal cinematic rendering of the intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (arrowhead) in relation to the pancreatic duct</p><span data-embedjson="{&quot;url&quot;:&quot;https:\/\/us.v-cdn.net\/6038601\/uploads\/66LNHAX8GXFA\/image.png&quot;,&quot;name&quot;:&quot;image.png&quot;,&quot;type&quot;:&quot;image\/png&quot;,&quot;size&quot;:425785,&quot;width&quot;:999,&quot;height&quot;:784,&quot;displaySize&quot;:&quot;medium&quot;,&quot;float&quot;:&quot;none&quot;,&quot;downloadUrl&quot;:&quot;https:\/\/connect.siemens-healthineers.com\/api\/v2\/media\/download-by-url?url=https%3A%2F%2Fus.v-cdn.net%2F6038601%2Fuploads%2F66LNHAX8GXFA%2Fimage.png&quot;,&quot;active&quot;:true,&quot;mediaID&quot;:1655,&quot;dateInserted&quot;:&quot;2026-08-27T17:21:00+00:00&quot;,&quot;insertUserID&quot;:14,&quot;foreignType&quot;:null,&quot;foreignID&quot;:null,&quot;embedType&quot;:&quot;image&quot;,&quot;embedStyle&quot;:&quot;rich_embed_card&quot;}">
    <span>
        <a href="https://connect.siemens-healthineers.com/ja/home/leaving?allowTrusted=1&amp;target=https%3A%2F%2Fus.v-cdn.net%2F6038601%2Fuploads%2F66LNHAX8GXFA%2Fimage.png" rel="nofollow noopener ugc" target="_blank">
            <img src="https://us.v-cdn.net/6038601/uploads/66LNHAX8GXFA/image.png" alt="image.png" height="784" width="999" data-display-size="medium" data-float="none" data-type="image/png" data-embed-type="image" srcset="https://us.v-cdn.net/cdn-cgi/image/quality=80, format=auto, fit=scale-down, height=300, width=300/6038601/uploads/66LNHAX8GXFA/image.png 300w, https://us.v-cdn.net/cdn-cgi/image/quality=80, format=auto, fit=scale-down, height=600, width=600/6038601/uploads/66LNHAX8GXFA/image.png 600w, https://us.v-cdn.net/cdn-cgi/image/quality=80, format=auto, fit=scale-down, height=800, width=800/6038601/uploads/66LNHAX8GXFA/image.png 800w, https://us.v-cdn.net/cdn-cgi/image/quality=80, format=auto, fit=scale-down, height=1200, width=1200/6038601/uploads/66LNHAX8GXFA/image.png 1200w, https://us.v-cdn.net/cdn-cgi/image/quality=80, format=auto, fit=scale-down, height=1600, width=1600/6038601/uploads/66LNHAX8GXFA/image.png 1600w, https://us.v-cdn.net/cdn-cgi/image/quality=80, format=auto, fit=scale-down, height=2000, width=2000/6038601/uploads/66LNHAX8GXFA/image.png 2000w, https://us.v-cdn.net/6038601/uploads/66LNHAX8GXFA/image.png" sizes="100vw" /></a>
    </span>
</span>
<p><strong>Figure 3.</strong> Axial T2-weighted image at 5-mm section thickness from MR cholangiopancreatography confirms the cystic nature of the lesion (arrow) but does not show the connection to the main pancreatic duct.</p><p>Source: Khanungwanitkul K, Schwartz FR. Photon-Counting CT Shows Side-Branch Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasm–Pancreatic Duct Connection. Radiology. 2024;312(2). doi:10.1148/radiol.240611.</p>]]>
        </description>
    </item>
    <item>
        <title>(2024) Huflage | Submillisievert PCCT for urinary calculi detection</title>
        <link>https://connect.siemens-healthineers.com/ja/discussion/484/2024-huflage-submillisievert-pcct-for-urinary-calculi-detection</link>
        <pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2026 17:14:44 +0000</pubDate>
        <category>Publication protocols</category>
        <dc:creator>Daniel Stromer</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">484@/ja/discussions</guid>
        <description><![CDATA[<div><div><p>Retrospective single-center study of 507 patients undergoing unenhanced abdominal CT for suspected urinary calculi, comparing PCCT (n = 229) with optimized EID-CT (n = 278).</p><p><br />
PCCT achieved a 44% lower effective radiation dose than EID-CT: 0.79 mSv vs 1.39 mSv, while maintaining excellent diagnostic confidence.</p><p><br />
Despite the lower dose, PCCT provided higher SNR, with improvements of 30% at the kidney, 23% at the psoas, and 17% at the obturator level. Interreader agreement for calculus detection was near perfect (Krippendorff α ≥ 0.99).</p></div></div><p><a href="https://connect.siemens-healthineers.com/ja/home/leaving?allowTrusted=1&amp;target=https%3A%2F%2Fpubs.rsna.org%2Fdoi%2F10.1148%2Fradiol.232453" rel="nofollow noopener ugc" role="button">Access publication</a></p><p></p><span data-embedjson="{&quot;url&quot;:&quot;https:\/\/us.v-cdn.net\/6038601\/uploads\/VNYNUKFBX8M1\/image.png&quot;,&quot;name&quot;:&quot;image.png&quot;,&quot;type&quot;:&quot;image\/png&quot;,&quot;size&quot;:1180483,&quot;width&quot;:2000,&quot;height&quot;:1150,&quot;displaySize&quot;:&quot;large&quot;,&quot;float&quot;:&quot;none&quot;,&quot;downloadUrl&quot;:&quot;https:\/\/connect.siemens-healthineers.com\/api\/v2\/media\/download-by-url?url=https%3A%2F%2Fus.v-cdn.net%2F6038601%2Fuploads%2FVNYNUKFBX8M1%2Fimage.png&quot;,&quot;active&quot;:true,&quot;mediaID&quot;:1652,&quot;dateInserted&quot;:&quot;2026-08-27T17:13:12+00:00&quot;,&quot;insertUserID&quot;:14,&quot;foreignType&quot;:null,&quot;foreignID&quot;:null,&quot;embedType&quot;:&quot;image&quot;,&quot;embedStyle&quot;:&quot;rich_embed_card&quot;}">
    <span>
        <a href="https://connect.siemens-healthineers.com/ja/home/leaving?allowTrusted=1&amp;target=https%3A%2F%2Fus.v-cdn.net%2F6038601%2Fuploads%2FVNYNUKFBX8M1%2Fimage.png" rel="nofollow noopener ugc" target="_blank">
            <img src="https://us.v-cdn.net/6038601/uploads/VNYNUKFBX8M1/image.png" alt="image.png" height="1150" width="2000" data-display-size="large" data-float="none" data-type="image/png" data-embed-type="image" srcset="https://us.v-cdn.net/cdn-cgi/image/quality=80, format=auto, fit=scale-down, height=300, width=300/6038601/uploads/VNYNUKFBX8M1/image.png 300w, https://us.v-cdn.net/cdn-cgi/image/quality=80, format=auto, fit=scale-down, height=600, width=600/6038601/uploads/VNYNUKFBX8M1/image.png 600w, https://us.v-cdn.net/cdn-cgi/image/quality=80, format=auto, fit=scale-down, height=800, width=800/6038601/uploads/VNYNUKFBX8M1/image.png 800w, https://us.v-cdn.net/cdn-cgi/image/quality=80, format=auto, fit=scale-down, height=1200, width=1200/6038601/uploads/VNYNUKFBX8M1/image.png 1200w, https://us.v-cdn.net/cdn-cgi/image/quality=80, format=auto, fit=scale-down, height=1600, width=1600/6038601/uploads/VNYNUKFBX8M1/image.png 1600w, https://us.v-cdn.net/cdn-cgi/image/quality=80, format=auto, fit=scale-down, height=2000, width=2000/6038601/uploads/VNYNUKFBX8M1/image.png 2000w, https://us.v-cdn.net/6038601/uploads/VNYNUKFBX8M1/image.png" sizes="100vw" /></a>
    </span>
</span>
<p><strong>Figure 2. </strong>Axial contrast-unenhanced abdominal CT examinations in a 38-year-old female patient with a body mass index (calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared) of 31.23 with known renal calculi for recurring events of flank pain. The patient underwent (A) dose-optimized energy-integrating detector CT (1.49 mSv) and (B) submillisievert photon-counting detector CT (0.94 mSv). Images from both examinations showed a 3-mm calculus in the left kidney (arrows).</p><p></p><h2 data-id="protocol">Protocol</h2><div><table><colgroup><col /><col /><col /></colgroup><tr><th><p><strong>Detail</strong></p></th><th><p><strong>Value</strong></p></th></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Scanner</strong></p></td><td><p>NAEOTOM Alpha</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Scan area</strong></p></td><td><p>Abdomen / urinary tract</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Scan mode</strong></p></td><td><p>Unenhanced ultra-low-dose CT</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Acquisition mode</strong></p></td><td><p>PCCT with tin prefiltration</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Tin filter</strong></p></td><td><p>0.4 mm</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Tube voltage [kV]</strong></p></td><td><p>Sn 100 / Sn 140, automatic selection</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Tube current</strong></p></td><td><p>Automatic</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>IQ level</strong></p></td><td><p>20</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Rotation time [s]</strong></p></td><td><p>0.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Detector slice collimation</strong></p></td><td><p>144 × 0.4 mm</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Reconstruction kernel</strong></p></td><td><p>Br36</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Reconstruction</strong></p></td><td><p>Iterative reconstruction, strength 3</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Slice thickness</strong></p></td><td><p>1 mm</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Contrast agent</strong></p></td><td><p>None</p></td></tr></table></div><p></p><h2 data-id="key-results">Key results</h2><div><table><colgroup><col /><col /><col /><col /></colgroup><tr><th><p><strong>Parameter</strong></p></th><th><p><strong>PCCT</strong></p></th><th><p><strong>EID-CT</strong></p></th></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Patients</strong></p></td><td><p>229</p></td><td><p>278</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>CTDIvol</strong></p></td><td><p>1.17 mGy</p></td><td><p>1.99 mGy</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Effective dose</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>0.79 mSv</strong></p></td><td><p>1.39 mSv</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Dose reduction</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>44%</strong></p></td><td><p>—</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Image noise</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>15.88 HU</strong></p></td><td><p>21.24 HU</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Kidney SNR</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2.15</strong></p></td><td><p>1.66</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Psoas SNR</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>3.01</strong></p></td><td><p>2.44</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Obturator SNR</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>3.25</strong></p></td><td><p>2.79</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Diagnostic confidence</strong></p></td><td><p>5/5</p></td><td><p>5/5</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Interreader agreement</strong></p></td><td><p>α ≥ 0.99</p></td><td><p>α ≥ 0.99</p></td></tr></table></div><p>PCCT therefore enabled <strong>submillisievert urinary stone imaging with simultaneous dose reduction and improved objective image quality</strong>, without loss of reader confidence.  </p><p><strong>Source:</strong> Huflage H, Kunz AS, Patzer TS, et al. <em>Submillisievert Abdominal Photon-Counting CT versus Energy-integrating Detector CT for Urinary Calculi Detection: Impact on Diagnostic Confidence.</em> <strong>Radiology.</strong> 2024;312(1). doi:10.1148/radiol.232453.</p>]]>
        </description>
    </item>
    <item>
        <title>(2024) Rau | PCCT virtual non-contrast imaging accurately characterizes uncomplicated renal cysts</title>
        <link>https://connect.siemens-healthineers.com/ja/discussion/478/2024-rau-pcct-virtual-non-contrast-imaging-accurately-characterizes-uncomplicated-renal-cysts</link>
        <pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2026 08:18:18 +0000</pubDate>
        <category>Publication protocols</category>
        <dc:creator>Daniel Stromer</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">478@/ja/discussions</guid>
        <description><![CDATA[<div><div><p>PCCT-derived virtual non-contrast (VNC) images provided renal cyst attenuation measurements comparable to true non-contrast imaging, with no significant difference across true non-contrast, arterial VNC, and portal-venous VNC (p = 0.301).</p><p><br />
In contrast, dual-energy EID-CT VNC showed a significant difference from true non-contrast attenuation (p = 0.02) and produced false-positive enhancement &gt;20 HU in 5/19 lesions (26.3%).</p><p><br />
With PCCT, all evaluated cysts remained below the 20-HU enhancement threshold on both arterial and portal-venous VNC, supporting VNC as a potential replacement for true non-contrast imaging in uncomplicated renal cyst characterization.</p></div></div><p><a href="https://connect.siemens-healthineers.com/ja/home/leaving?allowTrusted=1&amp;target=https%3A%2F%2Flink.springer.com%2Farticle%2F10.1007%2Fs11547-024-01801-2" rel="nofollow noopener ugc" role="button">Access publication</a></p><p></p><span data-embedjson="{&quot;url&quot;:&quot;https:\/\/us.v-cdn.net\/6038601\/uploads\/LXIQA94QE5PT\/image.png&quot;,&quot;name&quot;:&quot;image.png&quot;,&quot;type&quot;:&quot;image\/png&quot;,&quot;size&quot;:1534122,&quot;width&quot;:2030,&quot;height&quot;:1562,&quot;displaySize&quot;:&quot;medium&quot;,&quot;float&quot;:&quot;none&quot;,&quot;downloadUrl&quot;:&quot;https:\/\/connect.siemens-healthineers.com\/api\/v2\/media\/download-by-url?url=https%3A%2F%2Fus.v-cdn.net%2F6038601%2Fuploads%2FLXIQA94QE5PT%2Fimage.png&quot;,&quot;active&quot;:true,&quot;mediaID&quot;:1627,&quot;dateInserted&quot;:&quot;2026-08-26T08:14:38+00:00&quot;,&quot;insertUserID&quot;:14,&quot;foreignType&quot;:&quot;embed&quot;,&quot;foreignID&quot;:&quot;14&quot;,&quot;embedType&quot;:&quot;image&quot;,&quot;embedStyle&quot;:&quot;rich_embed_card&quot;}">
    <span>
        <a href="https://connect.siemens-healthineers.com/ja/home/leaving?allowTrusted=1&amp;target=https%3A%2F%2Fus.v-cdn.net%2F6038601%2Fuploads%2FLXIQA94QE5PT%2Fimage.png" rel="nofollow noopener ugc" target="_blank">
            <img src="https://us.v-cdn.net/6038601/uploads/LXIQA94QE5PT/image.png" alt="image.png" height="1562" width="2030" data-display-size="medium" data-float="none" data-type="image/png" data-embed-type="image" srcset="https://us.v-cdn.net/cdn-cgi/image/quality=80, format=auto, fit=scale-down, height=300, width=300/6038601/uploads/LXIQA94QE5PT/image.png 300w, https://us.v-cdn.net/cdn-cgi/image/quality=80, format=auto, fit=scale-down, height=600, width=600/6038601/uploads/LXIQA94QE5PT/image.png 600w, https://us.v-cdn.net/cdn-cgi/image/quality=80, format=auto, fit=scale-down, height=800, width=800/6038601/uploads/LXIQA94QE5PT/image.png 800w, https://us.v-cdn.net/cdn-cgi/image/quality=80, format=auto, fit=scale-down, height=1200, width=1200/6038601/uploads/LXIQA94QE5PT/image.png 1200w, https://us.v-cdn.net/cdn-cgi/image/quality=80, format=auto, fit=scale-down, height=1600, width=1600/6038601/uploads/LXIQA94QE5PT/image.png 1600w, https://us.v-cdn.net/cdn-cgi/image/quality=80, format=auto, fit=scale-down, height=2000, width=2000/6038601/uploads/LXIQA94QE5PT/image.png 2000w, https://us.v-cdn.net/6038601/uploads/LXIQA94QE5PT/image.png" sizes="100vw" /></a>
    </span>
</span>
<p><strong>Figure 2. </strong>Example of Density-measurements in a simple renal cyst on EID DE-CT and PCCT images using true non-contrast, portal venous and virtual non-contrast derived images (from left to right). While true enhancement is &lt; 20 HU, EID DE-CT VNC-derived values are remarkably low leading to false-positive enhancement &gt; 20 HU. PCCT = photon-counting CT; DE EID-CT = dual-energy integrating detector CT.</p><p></p><h2 data-id="protocol">Protocol</h2><div><table><colgroup><col /><col /><col /></colgroup><tr><th><p>Detail</p></th><th><p>Value</p></th></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Scanner</strong></p></td><td><p>NAEOTOM Alpha</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Scan area</strong></p></td><td><p>Abdomen</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Acquisition</strong></p></td><td><p>Multiphase PCCT</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Scan mode</strong></p></td><td><p>QuantumPlus</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Phases</strong></p></td><td><p>True non-contrast, arterial, portal venous</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Tube voltage [kVp]</strong></p></td><td><p>120</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Tube current</strong></p></td><td><p>Automated attenuation-based modulation</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>IQ level</strong></p></td><td><p>100 (non-contrast &amp; arterial); 145 (portal venous)</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Effective mAs [mAs]</strong></p></td><td><p>99 (non-contrast); 100 (arterial &amp; portal venous)</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Rotation time [s]</strong></p></td><td><p>0.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Pitch</strong></p></td><td><p>0.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Collimation</strong></p></td><td><p>144 × 0.40 mm</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Contrast agent</strong></p></td><td><p>Iopromide (Ultravist 370 mg iodine/mL)</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Contrast amount</strong></p></td><td><p>Body-weight adapted, 1.2 mg/kg as reported</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Injection / saline flush</strong></p></td><td><p>4.0 mL/s; 40 mL saline</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Arterial timing</strong></p></td><td><p>Bolus tracking, descending aorta, 100-HU threshold</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Portal venous timing</strong></p></td><td><p>80 s after contrast administration</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Reconstruction</strong></p></td><td><p>70-keV virtual monoenergetic images</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Kernel</strong></p></td><td><p>Br40</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Slice thickness [mm]</strong></p></td><td><p>3.0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Increment [mm]</strong></p></td><td><p>3.0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Iterative reconstruction</strong></p></td><td><p>QIR 4</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Spectral reconstruction</strong></p></td><td><p>Arterial VNC + portal-venous VNC</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Reference imaging</strong></p></td><td><p>MRI and/or ultrasound</p></td></tr></table></div><p></p><h2 data-id="key-results">Key Results</h2><p></p><div><table><colgroup><col /><col /><col /></colgroup><tr><th><p>Parameter</p></th><th><p>Main finding</p></th></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Study cohort</strong></p></td><td><p>19 patients / 19 simple renal cysts</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>PCCT true non-contrast attenuation</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>13.7 ± 11.6 HU</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>PCCT arterial VNC</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>9.27 ± 10.1 HU</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>PCCT portal-venous VNC</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>12.3 ± 9.9 HU</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>PCCT attenuation comparison</strong></p></td><td><p>No significant difference, <strong>p = 0.301</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>PCCT arterial VNC enhancement</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>4.5 ± 5.0 HU</strong>, range −6.2 to 14.2</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>PCCT portal-venous VNC enhancement</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2.4 ± 5.3 HU</strong>, range −6.4 to 13.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>PCCT false-positive enhancement &gt;20 HU</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>0/19 (0%)</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>DE EID-CT false-positive enhancement &gt;20 HU</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>5/19 (26.3%)</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Portal-venous CTDIvol</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>PCCT </strong> <strong>8.66 mGy</strong> vs DE EID-CT <strong>10.95 mGy</strong>, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Clinical implication</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>PCCT</strong> VNC may potentially substitute true non-contrast imaging for simple renal cyst characterization</p></td></tr></table></div><p></p><p>The authors conclude that PCCT VNC provided reliable characterization comparable to true non-contrast imaging, while DE EID-CT VNC falsely characterized 26% of lesions; consequently, PCCT VNC could potentially reduce true non-contrast acquisitions, radiation exposure, and unnecessary follow-up imaging. </p><p><strong>Source:</strong><br />
Rau S, Rau A, Stein T, et al. <em>Value of virtual non-contrast images to identify uncomplicated cystic renal lesions: photon-counting detector CT vs. dual-energy integrating detector CT.</em> <strong>La Radiologia Medica.</strong> 2024;129:669–676. doi:10.1007/s11547-024-01801-2. </p>]]>
        </description>
    </item>
    <item>
        <title>(2024) Lin | PCCT enables protocol-independent liver fat quantification</title>
        <link>https://connect.siemens-healthineers.com/ja/discussion/477/2024-lin-pcct-enables-protocol-independent-liver-fat-quantification</link>
        <pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2026 08:11:31 +0000</pubDate>
        <category>Publication protocols</category>
        <dc:creator>Daniel Stromer</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">477@/ja/discussions</guid>
        <description><![CDATA[<div><div><p>PCCT-derived fat fraction (CTFF) showed excellent agreement with MRI proton density fat fraction (PDFF), supporting quantitative liver fat assessment using standardized PCCT attenuation values.</p><p><br />
A single conversion formula—MRI PDFF (%) = −0.58 × CT (HU) + 43.1—remained accurate across 90, 120, and 140 kVp and both standard- and low-dose protocols.</p><p><br />
Accuracy was maintained across different BMI and steatosis levels, while validation in patients with MASLD showed an ICC of 0.96 and a mean bias of only −0.2%, supporting PCCT as a potential tool for opportunistic liver fat quantification.</p></div></div><p><a href="https://connect.siemens-healthineers.com/ja/home/leaving?allowTrusted=1&amp;target=https%3A%2F%2Fpubs.rsna.org%2Fdoi%2F10.1148%2Fradiol.240038" rel="nofollow noopener ugc" role="button">Access publication</a></p><p></p><span data-embedjson="{&quot;url&quot;:&quot;https:\/\/us.v-cdn.net\/6038601\/uploads\/CN322JZU16NX\/image.png&quot;,&quot;name&quot;:&quot;image.png&quot;,&quot;type&quot;:&quot;image\/png&quot;,&quot;size&quot;:3904159,&quot;width&quot;:1900,&quot;height&quot;:1442,&quot;displaySize&quot;:&quot;large&quot;,&quot;float&quot;:&quot;none&quot;,&quot;downloadUrl&quot;:&quot;https:\/\/connect.siemens-healthineers.com\/api\/v2\/media\/download-by-url?url=https%3A%2F%2Fus.v-cdn.net%2F6038601%2Fuploads%2FCN322JZU16NX%2Fimage.png&quot;,&quot;active&quot;:true,&quot;mediaID&quot;:1625,&quot;dateInserted&quot;:&quot;2026-08-26T08:06:01+00:00&quot;,&quot;insertUserID&quot;:14,&quot;foreignType&quot;:&quot;embed&quot;,&quot;foreignID&quot;:&quot;14&quot;,&quot;embedType&quot;:&quot;image&quot;,&quot;embedStyle&quot;:&quot;rich_embed_card&quot;}">
    <span>
        <a href="https://connect.siemens-healthineers.com/ja/home/leaving?allowTrusted=1&amp;target=https%3A%2F%2Fus.v-cdn.net%2F6038601%2Fuploads%2FCN322JZU16NX%2Fimage.png" rel="nofollow noopener ugc" target="_blank">
            <img src="https://us.v-cdn.net/6038601/uploads/CN322JZU16NX/image.png" alt="image.png" height="1442" width="1900" data-display-size="large" data-float="none" data-type="image/png" data-embed-type="image" srcset="https://us.v-cdn.net/cdn-cgi/image/quality=80, format=auto, fit=scale-down, height=300, width=300/6038601/uploads/CN322JZU16NX/image.png 300w, https://us.v-cdn.net/cdn-cgi/image/quality=80, format=auto, fit=scale-down, height=600, width=600/6038601/uploads/CN322JZU16NX/image.png 600w, https://us.v-cdn.net/cdn-cgi/image/quality=80, format=auto, fit=scale-down, height=800, width=800/6038601/uploads/CN322JZU16NX/image.png 800w, https://us.v-cdn.net/cdn-cgi/image/quality=80, format=auto, fit=scale-down, height=1200, width=1200/6038601/uploads/CN322JZU16NX/image.png 1200w, https://us.v-cdn.net/cdn-cgi/image/quality=80, format=auto, fit=scale-down, height=1600, width=1600/6038601/uploads/CN322JZU16NX/image.png 1600w, https://us.v-cdn.net/cdn-cgi/image/quality=80, format=auto, fit=scale-down, height=2000, width=2000/6038601/uploads/CN322JZU16NX/image.png 2000w, https://us.v-cdn.net/6038601/uploads/CN322JZU16NX/image.png" sizes="100vw" /></a>
    </span>
</span>
<p><strong>Figure 2. </strong>Liver fat content measurement with photon-counting detector (PCD) CT and MRI-based proton density fat fraction (PDFF). Three regions of interest (circles) were delineated in the peripheral areas of the left, right anterior, and right posterior lobes of the liver. (A) Representative axial unenhanced 120-kVp standard-dose CT image (left) and corresponding MRI scan (right) in a 33-year-old man (body mass index, 26.2) diagnosed with metabolic dysfunction–associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) in the asymptomatic cohort. (B) Representative axial unenhanced 120-kVp low-dose CT image (left) and corresponding MRI scan (right) in a 69-year-old woman (body mass index, 24.6) in the MASLD cohort. Body mass index was calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared. FF = fat fraction.</p><p></p><h2 data-id="protocol">Protocol</h2><p></p><div><table><colgroup><col /><col /><col /></colgroup><tr><th><p>Detail</p></th><th><p>Value</p></th></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Scanner</strong></p></td><td><p>NAEOTOM Alpha</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Software</strong></p></td><td><p>VA50</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Scan area</strong></p></td><td><p>Entire liver and spleen</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Scan mode</strong></p></td><td><p>Spiral</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Acquisition mode</strong></p></td><td><p>QunatumPlus</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Tube voltage [kV]</strong></p></td><td><p>90, 120, 140</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Effective mAs [mAs]</strong></p></td><td><p>CARE Dose4D automatic</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>IQ level</strong></p></td><td><p>90 (low dose), 145 (standard dose)</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Dose modulation</strong></p></td><td><p>CARE Dose4D</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Rotation time [s]</strong></p></td><td><p>0.25</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Pitch</strong></p></td><td><p>0.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Detector slice collimation</strong></p></td><td><p>144 × 0.4 mm</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Slice thickness [mm]</strong></p></td><td><p>1.0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Reconstruction increment [mm]</strong></p></td><td><p>0.7</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Reconstruction kernel</strong></p></td><td><p>Br40</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Iterative reconstruction</strong></p></td><td><p>QIR 3</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Reconstruction</strong></p></td><td><p>70-keV virtual monoenergetic images</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Contrast agent</strong></p></td><td><p>None</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Postprocessing</strong></p></td><td><p>syngo.via MM Reading, VB60</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Reference standard</strong></p></td><td><p>MRI PDFF</p></td></tr></table></div><p></p><p></p><h2 data-id="key-results">Key Results</h2><div><table><colgroup><col /><col /><col /></colgroup><tr><th><p>Parameter</p></th><th><p>Main finding</p></th></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Conversion formula</strong></p></td><td><p>MRI PDFF (%) = <strong>−0.58 × CT (HU) + 43.1</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Asymptomatic validation</strong></p></td><td><p>ICC <strong>0.94</strong>; mean bias <strong>0.04% ± 2.3</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Protocol robustness</strong></p></td><td><p>ICC <strong>0.93–0.94</strong> across 90–140 kVp; <strong>0.95</strong> low dose and <strong>0.93</strong> standard dose</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>CTFF error</strong></p></td><td><p>Not significantly influenced by tube voltage, radiation dose, steatosis, or BMI</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>MASLD validation</strong></p></td><td><p>ICC <strong>0.96</strong>; mean bias <strong>−0.2% ± 2.1</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Clinical implication</strong></p></td><td><p>Standardized PCCT attenuation may enable protocol-independent quantitative and opportunistic liver fat assessment</p></td></tr></table></div><p></p><p><strong>Source:</strong><br />
Lin H, Xu X, Deng R, et al. <em>Photon-counting Detector CT for Liver Fat Quantification: Validation across Protocols in Metabolic Dysfunction–associated Steatotic Liver Disease.</em> Radiology. 2024;312(3). doi:10.1148/radiol.240038.</p>]]>
        </description>
    </item>
    <item>
        <title>(2023) Graafen | Soft Reconstruction Kernels Improve HCC Imaging on a PCCT</title>
        <link>https://connect.siemens-healthineers.com/ja/discussion/473/2023-graafen-soft-reconstruction-kernels-improve-hcc-imaging-on-a-pcct</link>
        <pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2026 07:00:52 +0000</pubDate>
        <category>Scientific publications</category>
        <dc:creator>Daniel Stromer</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">473@/ja/discussions</guid>
        <description><![CDATA[<div><div><p>In a phantom and clinical study involving 24 patients with viable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), Graafen et al. evaluated reconstruction kernels for triple-phase photon-counting detector CT (PCD-CT), using 50-keV virtual monoenergetic images. Image quality was assessed quantitatively through contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and edge sharpness and qualitatively by three readers.</p><p></p><p>The softest reconstruction kernels (sharpness level 36) produced the highest CNR across all contrast phases (all p &lt; 0.05) without significantly reducing lesion sharpness. Softer kernels were also rated significantly better for image noise and overall image quality, although image contrast and HCC lesion conspicuity did not significantly differ between kernels. There was also no meaningful image-quality difference between regular body and quantitative kernels at equivalent sharpness levels.</p><p></p><p>Bottom line: For HCC assessment with photon-counting CT, soft reconstruction kernels provide the best overall image quality. The authors specifically recommend quantitative soft kernels, because they maintain comparable image quality while preserving the possibility of subsequent spectral post-processing.</p></div></div><p><a href="https://connect.siemens-healthineers.com/ja/home/leaving?allowTrusted=1&amp;target=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.academicradiology.org%2Farticle%2FS1076-6332%2823%2900162-9%2Fabstract" rel="nofollow noopener ugc" role="button">Access publication</a></p><p>Source: Graafen D, Müller L, Halfmann MC, et al. Soft Reconstruction Kernels Improve HCC Imaging on a Photon-Counting Detector CT. Academic Radiology. 2023;30(Suppl 1):S143–S154. doi:10.1016/j.acra.2023.03.026.</p>]]>
        </description>
    </item>
    <item>
        <title>(2024) Dillinger | Low-keV VMI from portal venous PCCT enhances abdominal arterial contrast</title>
        <link>https://connect.siemens-healthineers.com/ja/discussion/472/2024-dillinger-low-kev-vmi-from-portal-venous-pcct-enhances-abdominal-arterial-contrast</link>
        <pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2026 06:57:15 +0000</pubDate>
        <category>Publication protocols</category>
        <dc:creator>Daniel Stromer</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">472@/ja/discussions</guid>
        <description><![CDATA[<div><div><p>This retrospective study of <strong>40 patients</strong> evaluated whether virtual monoenergetic images (VMI) reconstructed from <strong>portal venous PCCT</strong> could provide sufficient arterial vessel contrast and potentially serve as an alternative when a dedicated arterial phase is unavailable or suboptimal. </p><p></p><p><strong>40-keV VMI produced the highest arterial attenuation</strong>, reaching <strong>439 ± 97 HU versus 360 ± 97 HU</strong> on true polychromatic arterial images, corresponding to approximately <strong>18% higher vessel attenuation</strong>. This gain came at the cost of increased noise and substantially lower CNR and SNR. </p><p></p><p>Subjectively, <strong>40 keV provided the best vascular contrast</strong>, whereas <strong>70 keV provided the best overall image quality</strong> and represented a more balanced reconstruction with improved noise, CNR, and SNR compared with 40 keV. The findings suggest low-keV VMI may help salvage arterial information from portal venous PCCT datasets and potentially avoid repeat examinations in selected cases.  </p></div></div><p><a href="https://connect.siemens-healthineers.com/ja/home/leaving?allowTrusted=1&amp;target=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.mdpi.com%2F2075-4418%2F14%2F6%2F627" rel="nofollow noopener ugc" role="button">Access publication</a></p><p></p><span data-embedjson="{&quot;url&quot;:&quot;https:\/\/us.v-cdn.net\/6038601\/uploads\/X786QFZ6G8AF\/image.png&quot;,&quot;name&quot;:&quot;image.png&quot;,&quot;type&quot;:&quot;image\/png&quot;,&quot;size&quot;:1135652,&quot;width&quot;:2000,&quot;height&quot;:1150,&quot;displaySize&quot;:&quot;large&quot;,&quot;float&quot;:&quot;none&quot;,&quot;downloadUrl&quot;:&quot;https:\/\/connect.siemens-healthineers.com\/api\/v2\/media\/download-by-url?url=https%3A%2F%2Fus.v-cdn.net%2F6038601%2Fuploads%2FX786QFZ6G8AF%2Fimage.png&quot;,&quot;active&quot;:true,&quot;mediaID&quot;:1617,&quot;dateInserted&quot;:&quot;2026-08-08T06:54:18+00:00&quot;,&quot;insertUserID&quot;:14,&quot;foreignType&quot;:&quot;embed&quot;,&quot;foreignID&quot;:&quot;14&quot;,&quot;embedType&quot;:&quot;image&quot;,&quot;embedStyle&quot;:&quot;rich_embed_card&quot;}">
    <span>
        <a href="https://connect.siemens-healthineers.com/ja/home/leaving?allowTrusted=1&amp;target=https%3A%2F%2Fus.v-cdn.net%2F6038601%2Fuploads%2FX786QFZ6G8AF%2Fimage.png" rel="nofollow noopener ugc" target="_blank">
            <img src="https://us.v-cdn.net/6038601/uploads/X786QFZ6G8AF/image.png" alt="image.png" height="1150" width="2000" data-display-size="large" data-float="none" data-type="image/png" data-embed-type="image" srcset="https://us.v-cdn.net/cdn-cgi/image/quality=80, format=auto, fit=scale-down, height=300, width=300/6038601/uploads/X786QFZ6G8AF/image.png 300w, https://us.v-cdn.net/cdn-cgi/image/quality=80, format=auto, fit=scale-down, height=600, width=600/6038601/uploads/X786QFZ6G8AF/image.png 600w, https://us.v-cdn.net/cdn-cgi/image/quality=80, format=auto, fit=scale-down, height=800, width=800/6038601/uploads/X786QFZ6G8AF/image.png 800w, https://us.v-cdn.net/cdn-cgi/image/quality=80, format=auto, fit=scale-down, height=1200, width=1200/6038601/uploads/X786QFZ6G8AF/image.png 1200w, https://us.v-cdn.net/cdn-cgi/image/quality=80, format=auto, fit=scale-down, height=1600, width=1600/6038601/uploads/X786QFZ6G8AF/image.png 1600w, https://us.v-cdn.net/cdn-cgi/image/quality=80, format=auto, fit=scale-down, height=2000, width=2000/6038601/uploads/X786QFZ6G8AF/image.png 2000w, https://us.v-cdn.net/6038601/uploads/X786QFZ6G8AF/image.png" sizes="100vw" /></a>
    </span>
</span>
<p><strong>Figure 2.</strong> The same CT slice with pv contrast (center 130, width 550) at 40 keV (<strong>a</strong>), 70 keV (<strong>b</strong>), 100 keV (<strong>c</strong>), and 190 keV (<strong>d</strong>). (<strong>a</strong>) demonstrates major image noise with acceptable image quality and optimal vessel contrast. (<strong>b</strong>) shows no noise with a good vessel assessability and optimal image quality. (<strong>c</strong>) shows no noise, acceptable quality, and poor vascular contrast. (<strong>d</strong>) demonstrates no noise, no vessel contrast, and poor image quality. </p><span data-embedjson="{&quot;url&quot;:&quot;https:\/\/us.v-cdn.net\/6038601\/uploads\/I7QAKJPXNQB3\/image.png&quot;,&quot;name&quot;:&quot;image.png&quot;,&quot;type&quot;:&quot;image\/png&quot;,&quot;size&quot;:15562,&quot;width&quot;:571,&quot;height&quot;:225,&quot;displaySize&quot;:&quot;medium&quot;,&quot;float&quot;:&quot;none&quot;,&quot;downloadUrl&quot;:&quot;https:\/\/connect.siemens-healthineers.com\/api\/v2\/media\/download-by-url?url=https%3A%2F%2Fus.v-cdn.net%2F6038601%2Fuploads%2FI7QAKJPXNQB3%2Fimage.png&quot;,&quot;active&quot;:true,&quot;mediaID&quot;:1618,&quot;dateInserted&quot;:&quot;2026-08-08T06:57:06+00:00&quot;,&quot;insertUserID&quot;:14,&quot;foreignType&quot;:&quot;embed&quot;,&quot;foreignID&quot;:&quot;14&quot;,&quot;embedType&quot;:&quot;image&quot;,&quot;embedStyle&quot;:&quot;rich_embed_card&quot;}">
    <span>
        <a href="https://connect.siemens-healthineers.com/ja/home/leaving?allowTrusted=1&amp;target=https%3A%2F%2Fus.v-cdn.net%2F6038601%2Fuploads%2FI7QAKJPXNQB3%2Fimage.png" rel="nofollow noopener ugc" target="_blank">
            <img src="https://us.v-cdn.net/6038601/uploads/I7QAKJPXNQB3/image.png" alt="image.png" height="225" width="571" data-display-size="medium" data-float="none" data-type="image/png" data-embed-type="image" srcset="https://us.v-cdn.net/cdn-cgi/image/quality=80, format=auto, fit=scale-down, height=300, width=300/6038601/uploads/I7QAKJPXNQB3/image.png 300w, https://us.v-cdn.net/cdn-cgi/image/quality=80, format=auto, fit=scale-down, height=600, width=600/6038601/uploads/I7QAKJPXNQB3/image.png 600w, https://us.v-cdn.net/cdn-cgi/image/quality=80, format=auto, fit=scale-down, height=800, width=800/6038601/uploads/I7QAKJPXNQB3/image.png 800w, https://us.v-cdn.net/cdn-cgi/image/quality=80, format=auto, fit=scale-down, height=1200, width=1200/6038601/uploads/I7QAKJPXNQB3/image.png 1200w, https://us.v-cdn.net/cdn-cgi/image/quality=80, format=auto, fit=scale-down, height=1600, width=1600/6038601/uploads/I7QAKJPXNQB3/image.png 1600w, https://us.v-cdn.net/cdn-cgi/image/quality=80, format=auto, fit=scale-down, height=2000, width=2000/6038601/uploads/I7QAKJPXNQB3/image.png 2000w, https://us.v-cdn.net/6038601/uploads/I7QAKJPXNQB3/image.png" sizes="100vw" /></a>
    </span>
</span>
<h2 data-id="protocol">Protocol</h2><div><table><colgroup><col /><col /><col /></colgroup><tr><th><p>Detail</p></th><th><p>Value</p></th></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Scanner</strong></p></td><td><p>NAEOTOM Alpha</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Application</strong></p></td><td><p>Contrast-enhanced abdominal PCCT / abdominal arterial vessel assessment</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Study design</strong></p></td><td><p>Retrospective</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Study population</strong></p></td><td><p>40 patients</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Acquisition phases</strong></p></td><td><p>Arterial and portal venous</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Scan direction</strong></p></td><td><p>Cranio-caudal</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Tube voltage</strong></p></td><td><p>120 kV</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Pitch</strong></p></td><td><p>0.80</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Reconstruction increment</strong></p></td><td><p>0.70 mm</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Slice thickness</strong></p></td><td><p>1.0 mm</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Reconstruction kernel</strong></p></td><td><p>Qr40</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Postprocessing</strong></p></td><td><p>Monoenergetic+</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Workstation</strong></p></td><td><p>Syngo.via VB60A_HF04</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Contrast agent</strong></p></td><td><p>Xenetix 350 (iobitridol)</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Contrast volume</strong></p></td><td><p>100 mL</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Saline chaser</strong></p></td><td><p>50 mL</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Injector</strong></p></td><td><p>CT Motion XD8000</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Arterial bolus triggering</strong></p></td><td><p>CARE Bolus, threshold 140 HU</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Arterial phase delay</strong></p></td><td><p>7 s after threshold</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Portal venous phase delay</strong></p></td><td><p>55 s</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Analyzed vessels</strong></p></td><td><p>Descending aorta, coeliac trunk, superior mesenteric artery, bilateral renal arteries, bilateral common iliac arteries</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Objective endpoints</strong></p></td><td><p>Vessel attenuation, noise, SNR, CNR</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Subjective endpoints</strong></p></td><td><p>Overall image quality, arterial vessel contrast, image noise using 5-point Likert scales</p></td></tr></table></div><p></p><h2 data-id="key-results">Key Results</h2><div><table><colgroup><col /><col /><col /></colgroup><tr><th><p>Parameter</p></th><th><p>Main finding</p></th></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Arterial attenuation</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>40-keV portal venous VMI: 439 ± 97 HU</strong> vs <strong>360 ± 97 HU</strong> for true arterial polychromatic images (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001)</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Contrast gain at 40 keV</strong></p></td><td><p>Approximately <strong>18% higher arterial attenuation</strong> than the true arterial phase</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Best vascular contrast</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>40 keV</strong> provided the highest objective attenuation and best subjective arterial vessel contrast</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Noise</strong></p></td><td><p>Highest at <strong>40 keV</strong> and progressively decreased with increasing energy; VMI at ≥70 keV generally showed lower noise than arterial polychromatic images</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>CNR</strong></p></td><td><p>True arterial images: <strong>25.10 ± 9.38</strong>; highest portal venous VMI CNR at <strong>60 keV: 8.64 ± 3.58</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>SNR</strong></p></td><td><p>True arterial images: <strong>20.10 ± 8.30</strong>; all portal venous VMI levels had significantly lower SNR</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Best overall image quality</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>70 keV</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Reader agreement</strong></p></td><td><p>Substantial agreement for vessel contrast (<strong>κ = 0.799</strong>), image quality (<strong>κ = 0.742</strong>), and noise (<strong>κ = 0.712</strong>)</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Main implication</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>40-keV VMI can substantially enhance arterial contrast from portal venous PCCT</strong>, potentially allowing assessment of arterial vessels after suboptimal contrast timing or reducing the need for repeat/dedicated arterial acquisitions in selected cases.</p></td></tr></table></div><p></p><p><strong>Source:</strong><br />
Dillinger D, Overhoff D, Ayx I, Kaatsch HL, Hagen A, Schönberg SO, Waldeck S. <em>Optimizing Arterial Vessel Contrast in Portal Venous Phase with Virtual Monoenergetic Images from Photon-Counting Detector CT Scans of the Abdomen—First Clinical Experiences.</em> <strong>Diagnostics.</strong> 2024;14(6):627. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14060627.</p>]]>
        </description>
    </item>
    <item>
        <title>(2022) Decker | PCCT enables anemia detection from routine contrast-enhanced CT</title>
        <link>https://connect.siemens-healthineers.com/ja/discussion/471/2022-decker-pcct-enables-anemia-detection-from-routine-contrast-enhanced-ct</link>
        <pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2026 06:50:37 +0000</pubDate>
        <category>Scientific publications</category>
        <dc:creator>Daniel Stromer</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">471@/ja/discussions</guid>
        <description><![CDATA[<div><div><p>This proof-of-concept study demonstrates that <strong>spectral PCCT data from routine contrast-enhanced oncologic staging examinations can be used to detect and quantify anemia</strong> by measuring blood-pool attenuation on virtual non-contrast (VNC) images.</p><p></p><p>Mean blood-pool VNC attenuation showed a <strong>strong positive correlation with hemoglobin (R² = 0.81)</strong> and hematocrit (<strong>R² = 0.77</strong>), indicating that decreasing VNC attenuation closely reflects increasing anemia severity.</p><p></p><p>VNC attenuation progressively decreased from <strong>no anemia to mild, moderate, and severe anemia</strong>, demonstrating the potential for opportunistic identification of previously unknown or worsening anemia directly from routinely acquired contrast-enhanced PCCT examinations. </p></div></div><p><a href="https://connect.siemens-healthineers.com/ja/home/leaving?allowTrusted=1&amp;target=https%3A%2F%2Fpubs.rsna.org%2Fdoi%2F10.1148%2Fradiol.220063" rel="nofollow noopener ugc" role="button">Access publication</a></p><p></p><span data-embedjson="{&quot;url&quot;:&quot;https:\/\/us.v-cdn.net\/6038601\/uploads\/G1QAAVYVBWF3\/image.png&quot;,&quot;name&quot;:&quot;image.png&quot;,&quot;type&quot;:&quot;image\/png&quot;,&quot;size&quot;:358566,&quot;width&quot;:1280,&quot;height&quot;:720,&quot;displaySize&quot;:&quot;large&quot;,&quot;float&quot;:&quot;none&quot;,&quot;downloadUrl&quot;:&quot;https:\/\/connect.siemens-healthineers.com\/api\/v2\/media\/download-by-url?url=https%3A%2F%2Fus.v-cdn.net%2F6038601%2Fuploads%2FG1QAAVYVBWF3%2Fimage.png&quot;,&quot;active&quot;:true,&quot;mediaID&quot;:1616,&quot;dateInserted&quot;:&quot;2026-08-08T06:48:58+00:00&quot;,&quot;insertUserID&quot;:14,&quot;foreignType&quot;:&quot;embed&quot;,&quot;foreignID&quot;:&quot;14&quot;,&quot;embedType&quot;:&quot;image&quot;,&quot;embedStyle&quot;:&quot;rich_embed_card&quot;}">
    <span>
        <a href="https://connect.siemens-healthineers.com/ja/home/leaving?allowTrusted=1&amp;target=https%3A%2F%2Fus.v-cdn.net%2F6038601%2Fuploads%2FG1QAAVYVBWF3%2Fimage.png" rel="nofollow noopener ugc" target="_blank">
            <img src="https://us.v-cdn.net/6038601/uploads/G1QAAVYVBWF3/image.png" alt="image.png" height="720" width="1280" data-display-size="large" data-float="none" data-type="image/png" data-embed-type="image" srcset="https://us.v-cdn.net/cdn-cgi/image/quality=80, format=auto, fit=scale-down, height=300, width=300/6038601/uploads/G1QAAVYVBWF3/image.png 300w, https://us.v-cdn.net/cdn-cgi/image/quality=80, format=auto, fit=scale-down, height=600, width=600/6038601/uploads/G1QAAVYVBWF3/image.png 600w, https://us.v-cdn.net/cdn-cgi/image/quality=80, format=auto, fit=scale-down, height=800, width=800/6038601/uploads/G1QAAVYVBWF3/image.png 800w, https://us.v-cdn.net/cdn-cgi/image/quality=80, format=auto, fit=scale-down, height=1200, width=1200/6038601/uploads/G1QAAVYVBWF3/image.png 1200w, https://us.v-cdn.net/cdn-cgi/image/quality=80, format=auto, fit=scale-down, height=1600, width=1600/6038601/uploads/G1QAAVYVBWF3/image.png 1600w, https://us.v-cdn.net/cdn-cgi/image/quality=80, format=auto, fit=scale-down, height=2000, width=2000/6038601/uploads/G1QAAVYVBWF3/image.png 2000w, https://us.v-cdn.net/6038601/uploads/G1QAAVYVBWF3/image.png" sizes="100vw" /></a>
    </span>
</span>
<h2 data-id="key-results">Key Results</h2><div><table><colgroup><col /><col /><col /></colgroup><tr><th><p>Parameter</p></th><th><p>Main finding</p></th></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Study population</strong></p></td><td><p>179 oncologic patients; mean age <strong>68 ± 11 years</strong>; 77 women and 102 men</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Hemoglobin correlation</strong></p></td><td><p>Mean VNC blood-pool attenuation strongly correlated with hemoglobin: <strong>R² = 0.81</strong> (95% CI: 0.76–0.86; <em>P</em> &lt; .001)</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Hematocrit correlation</strong></p></td><td><p>Strong correlation with hematocrit: <strong>R² = 0.77</strong> (95% CI: 0.70–0.82; <em>P</em> &lt; .001)</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Women – no anemia</strong></p></td><td><p>Mean VNC attenuation <strong>44.2 ± 3.6 HU</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Women – mild anemia</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>40.6 ± 2.0 HU</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Women – moderate anemia</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>35.2 ± 3.6 HU</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Women – severe anemia</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>25.0 ± 3.5 HU</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Men – no anemia</strong></p></td><td><p>Mean VNC attenuation <strong>46.4 ± 3.5 HU</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Men – mild anemia</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>41.8 ± 2.5 HU</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Men – moderate anemia</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>36.4 ± 3.6 HU</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Men – severe anemia</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>33.3 ± 1.2 HU</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Main implication</strong></p></td><td><p>Spectral PCCT VNC imaging may provide an <strong>opportunistic quantitative marker of anemia</strong> from routine contrast-enhanced examinations without requiring a dedicated non-contrast acquisition.</p></td></tr></table></div><p><strong>Source:</strong><br />
Decker JA, Huber A, Senel F, Bette S, Braun F, Risch F, Woźnicki P, et al. <em>Anemia Detection by Hemoglobin Quantification on Contrast-enhanced Photon-counting CT Data Sets.</em> <strong>Radiology.</strong> 2022;305(3):650–652. doi: 10.1148/radiol.220063. </p>]]>
        </description>
    </item>
    <item>
        <title>(2024) Dane | Pancreatic cyst prevalence and detection with PCCT compared with EID-CT</title>
        <link>https://connect.siemens-healthineers.com/ja/discussion/470/2024-dane-pancreatic-cyst-prevalence-and-detection-with-pcct-compared-with-eid-ct</link>
        <pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2026 06:45:24 +0000</pubDate>
        <category>Scientific publications</category>
        <dc:creator>Daniel Stromer</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">470@/ja/discussions</guid>
        <description><![CDATA[<div><div><p>In a retrospective single-center study of 2,494 patients, photon-counting CT (PCCT) demonstrated a significantly higher pancreatic cyst detection rate than conventional energy-integrating detector CT (EIDCT): 4.9% (49/1,009) vs 3.0% (44/1,485), p = 0.017. </p><p></p><p>The largest difference occurred with CT angiography, where cysts were detected in 6.6% with PCCT versus 0% with EIDCT (p &lt; 0.001). Among patients with prior conventional CT examinations, PCCT-detected cysts were also more frequently newly reported (40.7% vs 14.8%, p = 0.027). </p><p></p><p>Cyst size did not differ significantly between modalities. Overall, the findings suggest that PCCT improves detection and conspicuity of pancreatic cysts compared with conventional CT, particularly on CT angiographic examinations.</p></div></div><p><a href="https://connect.siemens-healthineers.com/ja/home/leaving?allowTrusted=1&amp;target=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ejradiology.com%2Farticle%2FS0720-048X%2824%2900153-0%2Fabstract" rel="nofollow noopener ugc" role="button">Access publication</a></p><p>Source: Dane B, Kim J, Qian K, Megibow A. Pancreatic cyst prevalence and detection with photon counting CT compared with conventional energy integrating detector CT. European Journal of Radiology. 2024;175:111437. doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111437.</p>]]>
        </description>
    </item>
    <item>
        <title>(2024) Bette | PCCT virtual non-contrast imaging differentiates adrenal adenomas from metastases</title>
        <link>https://connect.siemens-healthineers.com/ja/discussion/469/2024-bette-pcct-virtual-non-contrast-imaging-differentiates-adrenal-adenomas-from-metastases</link>
        <pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2026 06:39:31 +0000</pubDate>
        <category>Publication protocols</category>
        <dc:creator>Daniel Stromer</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">469@/ja/discussions</guid>
        <description><![CDATA[<div><div><p><strong>PCCT virtual non-contrast (VNC) reconstructions</strong> differentiated adrenal adenomas from metastases on portal-venous contrast-enhanced imaging, with adenomas showing significantly lower attenuation on both conventional VNC (VNCConv) and calcium-preserving PureCalcium VNC (VNCPC) (<em>p</em> = 0.007). </p><p></p><p>VNC nevertheless <strong>systematically overestimated attenuation compared with true non-contrast (TNC)</strong> imaging: mean differences were <strong>17.67 HU for VNCConv</strong> and <strong>14.85 HU for VNCPC</strong>, indicating that the conventional <strong>10-HU TNC threshold cannot simply be transferred to PCCT VNC</strong>. </p><p></p><p>Diagnostic performance was particularly strong for <strong>VNCPC (AUC 0.931)</strong> and when combining all available spectral information (<strong>AUC 0.938</strong>). For VNCConv, a higher threshold of <strong>26 HU</strong> achieved <strong>86.7% sensitivity and 75.6% specificity</strong>, supporting a PCCT-specific VNC threshold for adrenal lesion characterization. </p></div></div><p><a href="https://connect.siemens-healthineers.com/ja/home/leaving?allowTrusted=1&amp;target=https%3A%2F%2Flink.springer.com%2Farticle%2F10.1007%2Fs00330-024-10675-x" rel="nofollow noopener ugc" role="button">Access publication</a></p><p></p><span data-embedjson="{&quot;url&quot;:&quot;https:\/\/us.v-cdn.net\/6038601\/uploads\/87WR1SDBK0XA\/image.png&quot;,&quot;name&quot;:&quot;image.png&quot;,&quot;type&quot;:&quot;image\/png&quot;,&quot;size&quot;:1461715,&quot;width&quot;:1415,&quot;height&quot;:1064,&quot;displaySize&quot;:&quot;large&quot;,&quot;float&quot;:&quot;none&quot;,&quot;downloadUrl&quot;:&quot;https:\/\/connect.siemens-healthineers.com\/api\/v2\/media\/download-by-url?url=https%3A%2F%2Fus.v-cdn.net%2F6038601%2Fuploads%2F87WR1SDBK0XA%2Fimage.png&quot;,&quot;active&quot;:true,&quot;mediaID&quot;:1615,&quot;dateInserted&quot;:&quot;2026-08-08T06:38:26+00:00&quot;,&quot;insertUserID&quot;:14,&quot;foreignType&quot;:&quot;embed&quot;,&quot;foreignID&quot;:&quot;14&quot;,&quot;embedType&quot;:&quot;image&quot;,&quot;embedStyle&quot;:&quot;rich_embed_card&quot;}">
    <span>
        <a href="https://connect.siemens-healthineers.com/ja/home/leaving?allowTrusted=1&amp;target=https%3A%2F%2Fus.v-cdn.net%2F6038601%2Fuploads%2F87WR1SDBK0XA%2Fimage.png" rel="nofollow noopener ugc" target="_blank">
            <img src="https://us.v-cdn.net/6038601/uploads/87WR1SDBK0XA/image.png" alt="image.png" height="1064" width="1415" data-display-size="large" data-float="none" data-type="image/png" data-embed-type="image" srcset="https://us.v-cdn.net/cdn-cgi/image/quality=80, format=auto, fit=scale-down, height=300, width=300/6038601/uploads/87WR1SDBK0XA/image.png 300w, https://us.v-cdn.net/cdn-cgi/image/quality=80, format=auto, fit=scale-down, height=600, width=600/6038601/uploads/87WR1SDBK0XA/image.png 600w, https://us.v-cdn.net/cdn-cgi/image/quality=80, format=auto, fit=scale-down, height=800, width=800/6038601/uploads/87WR1SDBK0XA/image.png 800w, https://us.v-cdn.net/cdn-cgi/image/quality=80, format=auto, fit=scale-down, height=1200, width=1200/6038601/uploads/87WR1SDBK0XA/image.png 1200w, https://us.v-cdn.net/cdn-cgi/image/quality=80, format=auto, fit=scale-down, height=1600, width=1600/6038601/uploads/87WR1SDBK0XA/image.png 1600w, https://us.v-cdn.net/cdn-cgi/image/quality=80, format=auto, fit=scale-down, height=2000, width=2000/6038601/uploads/87WR1SDBK0XA/image.png 2000w, https://us.v-cdn.net/6038601/uploads/87WR1SDBK0XA/image.png" sizes="100vw" /></a>
    </span>
</span>
<p><strong>Figure 1.</strong> Example of semiautomatic segmentation of a left adrenal adenoma using 3D Slicer.</p><p></p><h2 data-id="protocol">Protocol</h2><div><table><colgroup><col /><col /><col /></colgroup><tr><th><p>Detail</p></th><th><p>Value</p></th></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Scanner</strong></p></td><td><p>NAEOTOM Alpha</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Application</strong></p></td><td><p>Contrast-enhanced abdominal CT / adrenal lesion characterization</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Study design</strong></p></td><td><p>Retrospective, single-center</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Acquisition mode</strong></p></td><td><p>Abdomen QuantumPlus with spectral information</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Contrast phase</strong></p></td><td><p>Portal venous</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Scan direction</strong></p></td><td><p>Craniocaudal</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Patient position</strong></p></td><td><p>Supine</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Breath-hold</strong></p></td><td><p>Single breath-hold</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Tube voltage</strong></p></td><td><p>120 kV</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Rotation time</strong></p></td><td><p>0.5 s or 0.25 s</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Collimation</strong></p></td><td><p>144 × 0.4 mm</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Slice thickness</strong></p></td><td><p>1.0 mm</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Reconstruction increment</strong></p></td><td><p>0.5 mm</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Reconstruction kernel</strong></p></td><td><p>Qr40</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Iterative reconstruction</strong></p></td><td><p>QIR 3</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Reconstruction software</strong></p></td><td><p>ReconCT 16.0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>TNC reconstruction software</strong></p></td><td><p>Syngo.via VB60A</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>VNC reconstructions</strong></p></td><td><p>Conventional VNC (VNCConv) and PureCalcium VNC (VNCPC)</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>VNC energy</strong></p></td><td><p>70 keV</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Virtual monoenergetic images</strong></p></td><td><p>40–90 keV in 10-keV increments</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Additional spectral reconstruction</strong></p></td><td><p>Iodine maps</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Contrast agent</strong></p></td><td><p>Ultravist 300 mg I/mL</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Contrast volume</strong></p></td><td><p>100 mL</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Flow rate</strong></p></td><td><p>4.0 mL/s</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Saline chaser</strong></p></td><td><p>30 mL</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Scan delay</strong></p></td><td><p>Fixed 75 s after contrast injection</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>True non-contrast imaging</strong></p></td><td><p>Available in 49/90 patients; obtained either within the same protocol or from a separate CT acquisition</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Lesion analysis</strong></p></td><td><p>Semiautomatic whole-lesion 3D segmentation</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Segmentation software</strong></p></td><td><p>3D Slicer</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Primary comparison</strong></p></td><td><p>VNCConv and VNCPC vs TNC; spectral imaging for adenoma vs metastasis differentiation</p></td></tr></table></div><p></p><h2 data-id="key-results">Key Results</h2><div><table><colgroup><col /><col /><col /></colgroup><tr><th><p>Parameter</p></th><th><p>Main finding</p></th></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Study population</strong></p></td><td><p>90 patients; 45 adrenal adenomas and 45 metastases</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>VNCConv attenuation</strong></p></td><td><p>Adenomas <strong>18.15 HU [12.92–24.26]</strong> vs metastases <strong>31.28 HU [26.00–35.89]</strong>; <em>p</em> = 0.007</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>VNCPC attenuation</strong></p></td><td><p>Adenomas <strong>16.00 HU [11.02–21.56]</strong> vs metastases <strong>27.22 HU [22.59–30.64]</strong>; <em>p</em> = 0.007</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>VNCConv vs TNC</strong></p></td><td><p>VNCConv overestimated attenuation by a mean <strong>17.67 HU</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>VNCPC vs TNC</strong></p></td><td><p>VNCPC overestimated attenuation by a mean <strong>14.85 HU</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>All spectral features</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>AUC 0.938</strong> for adenoma/metastasis discrimination</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>VNCPC alone</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>AUC 0.931</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>VNCConv alone</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>AUC 0.857</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>TNC alone</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>AUC 0.762</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>VNCConv 26-HU cutoff</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>86.7% sensitivity, 75.6% specificity</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Feature importance</strong></p></td><td><p>VNCConv and VNCPC were the most important discriminators in random-forest feature selection</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Main implication</strong></p></td><td><p>PCCT VNC may enable adrenal lesion characterization from contrast-enhanced scans, potentially reducing additional dedicated adrenal CT/MRI examinations, but requires a <strong>higher VNC-specific HU threshold</strong> rather than direct application of the conventional 10-HU TNC cutoff.</p></td></tr></table></div><p><strong>Source:</strong><br />
Bette S, Risch F, Canalini L, Becker J, Leithner EV, Huber A, Haerting M, Jehs B, Wollny C, Schwarz F, Tehlan K, Scheurig-Muenkler C, Wendler T, Kroencke T, Decker JA. <em>Diagnostic performance of photon-counting detector CT for differentiation between adrenal adenomas and metastases.</em> European Radiology. 2024;34:5944–5953. </p>]]>
        </description>
    </item>
    <item>
        <title>(2022) Bette | Low-keV PCCT improves conspicuity of hypovascularized liver metastases</title>
        <link>https://connect.siemens-healthineers.com/ja/discussion/468/2022-bette-low-kev-pcct-improves-conspicuity-of-hypovascularized-liver-metastases</link>
        <pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2026 06:35:12 +0000</pubDate>
        <category>Publication protocols</category>
        <dc:creator>Daniel Stromer</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">468@/ja/discussions</guid>
        <description><![CDATA[<p></p><div><div><p><strong>PCCT virtual monoenergetic imaging (VMI)</strong> improved visualization of hypovascularized liver metastases, with the greatest lesion conspicuity and CNR achieved at the <strong>low end of the keV spectrum</strong>. At 40 keV, tumor-to-liver ratio (TLR) reached <strong>0.37</strong>, while CNR peaked at <strong>6.88</strong>.</p><p></p><p>Compared with conventional EID-CT, PCCT showed <strong>lower image noise at 70 keV</strong> (15.4 vs. 17.1 HU), while VMI below 70 keV produced higher lesion CNR and greater tumor-to-liver contrast.</p><p></p><p>The advantage was particularly relevant in patients with <strong>higher BMI</strong>: around the clinically relevant 60–80 keV range, PCCT maintained image noise and largely preserved CNR despite a more moderate CTDI upregulation than EID-CT. </p></div></div><p><a href="https://connect.siemens-healthineers.com/ja/home/leaving?allowTrusted=1&amp;target=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.mdpi.com%2F2075-4418%2F12%2F5%2F1231" rel="nofollow noopener ugc" role="button">Access publication</a></p><p></p><span data-embedjson="{&quot;url&quot;:&quot;https:\/\/us.v-cdn.net\/6038601\/uploads\/MTIQ6E0CDSOK\/image.png&quot;,&quot;name&quot;:&quot;image.png&quot;,&quot;type&quot;:&quot;image\/png&quot;,&quot;size&quot;:3095899,&quot;width&quot;:3000,&quot;height&quot;:1725,&quot;displaySize&quot;:&quot;large&quot;,&quot;float&quot;:&quot;none&quot;,&quot;downloadUrl&quot;:&quot;https:\/\/connect.siemens-healthineers.com\/api\/v2\/media\/download-by-url?url=https%3A%2F%2Fus.v-cdn.net%2F6038601%2Fuploads%2FMTIQ6E0CDSOK%2Fimage.png&quot;,&quot;active&quot;:true,&quot;mediaID&quot;:1614,&quot;dateInserted&quot;:&quot;2026-08-08T06:34:08+00:00&quot;,&quot;insertUserID&quot;:14,&quot;foreignType&quot;:&quot;embed&quot;,&quot;foreignID&quot;:&quot;14&quot;,&quot;embedType&quot;:&quot;image&quot;,&quot;embedStyle&quot;:&quot;rich_embed_card&quot;}">
    <span>
        <a href="https://connect.siemens-healthineers.com/ja/home/leaving?allowTrusted=1&amp;target=https%3A%2F%2Fus.v-cdn.net%2F6038601%2Fuploads%2FMTIQ6E0CDSOK%2Fimage.png" rel="nofollow noopener ugc" target="_blank">
            <img src="https://us.v-cdn.net/6038601/uploads/MTIQ6E0CDSOK/image.png" alt="image.png" height="1725" width="3000" data-display-size="large" data-float="none" data-type="image/png" data-embed-type="image" srcset="https://us.v-cdn.net/cdn-cgi/image/quality=80, format=auto, fit=scale-down, height=300, width=300/6038601/uploads/MTIQ6E0CDSOK/image.png 300w, https://us.v-cdn.net/cdn-cgi/image/quality=80, format=auto, fit=scale-down, height=600, width=600/6038601/uploads/MTIQ6E0CDSOK/image.png 600w, https://us.v-cdn.net/cdn-cgi/image/quality=80, format=auto, fit=scale-down, height=800, width=800/6038601/uploads/MTIQ6E0CDSOK/image.png 800w, https://us.v-cdn.net/cdn-cgi/image/quality=80, format=auto, fit=scale-down, height=1200, width=1200/6038601/uploads/MTIQ6E0CDSOK/image.png 1200w, https://us.v-cdn.net/cdn-cgi/image/quality=80, format=auto, fit=scale-down, height=1600, width=1600/6038601/uploads/MTIQ6E0CDSOK/image.png 1600w, https://us.v-cdn.net/cdn-cgi/image/quality=80, format=auto, fit=scale-down, height=2000, width=2000/6038601/uploads/MTIQ6E0CDSOK/image.png 2000w, https://us.v-cdn.net/6038601/uploads/MTIQ6E0CDSOK/image.png" sizes="100vw" /></a>
    </span>
</span>
<p><strong>Figure 4.</strong> Example of PCD-VMIs (40–190 keV) in a patient with hypovascularized liver metastases of pleura mesothelioma. Hypovascularized metastasis in segment VI (arrow). </p><h2 data-id="protocol">Protocol</h2><div><table><colgroup><col /><col /><col /></colgroup><tr><th><p>Detail</p></th><th><p>Value</p></th></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Scanner (PCCT)</strong></p></td><td><p>NAEOTOM Alpha</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Scanner (EID-CT)</strong></p></td><td><p>SOMATOM AS20</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Application</strong></p></td><td><p>Contrast-enhanced abdominal oncologic CT; hypovascularized liver metastases</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Study population</strong></p></td><td><p>100 patients with liver metastases: PCCT n = 50, EID-CT n = 50</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>PCCT acquisition mode</strong></p></td><td><p>QuantumPlus with spectral information</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Detector energy thresholds</strong></p></td><td><p>20, 35, 65, 70 keV</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Scan direction</strong></p></td><td><p>Craniocaudal</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Patient position</strong></p></td><td><p>Supine</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Scan range</strong></p></td><td><p>Diaphragm or upper thoracic aperture to symphysis</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Breath-hold</strong></p></td><td><p>Single breath-hold</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Tube voltage (PCCT)</strong></p></td><td><p>120 kVp</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Tube current modulation</strong></p></td><td><p>CARE Dose4D</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>IQ level</strong></p></td><td><p>145</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Rotation time</strong></p></td><td><p>0.25 s</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Pitch</strong></p></td><td><p>0.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Collimation</strong></p></td><td><p>144 × 0.4 mm</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Reconstruction kernel</strong></p></td><td><p>Qr40</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Iterative reconstruction</strong></p></td><td><p>QIR 3</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Slice thickness</strong></p></td><td><p>1.0 mm</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Reconstruction increment</strong></p></td><td><p>1.0 mm</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Spectral postprocessing</strong></p></td><td><p>SPP spectral series</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>VMI levels</strong></p></td><td><p>40, 45, 50, 55, 60, 70, 80, 90, 100, 110, 130, 150, 170, 190 keV</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Contrast agent</strong></p></td><td><p>Iopromide (Ultravist 300 mg I/mL)</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Contrast volume</strong></p></td><td><p>120 mL</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Saline chaser</strong></p></td><td><p>30 mL</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Flow rate</strong></p></td><td><p>4.0 mL/s</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Bolus triggering</strong></p></td><td><p>120 HU in ascending aorta</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Post-trigger delay</strong></p></td><td><p>45 s</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>EID-CT tube voltage</strong></p></td><td><p>Auto-kV; 100 kVp in 46 patients, 120 kVp in 4 patients</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>EID-CT rotation time</strong></p></td><td><p>0.5 s</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>EID-CT pitch</strong></p></td><td><p>1.05</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>EID-CT collimation</strong></p></td><td><p>1.5 × 16 × 1.2 mm</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>EID-CT reconstruction</strong></p></td><td><p>I31f, SAFIRE level 3</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Primary endpoints</strong></p></td><td><p>Image noise, tumor-to-liver ratio (TLR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), BMI-dependent performance</p></td></tr></table></div><p></p><h2 data-id="key-results">Key Results</h2><div><table><colgroup><col /><col /><col /></colgroup><tr><th><p>Parameter</p></th><th><p>Main finding</p></th></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Optimal lesion conspicuity</strong></p></td><td><p>Greatest at <strong>low-keV VMI</strong>; TLR was lowest at <strong>40 keV (0.37)</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>CNR</strong></p></td><td><p>Maximum at the low end of the spectrum: <strong>6.88</strong>; CNR was significantly higher at ≤70 keV than &gt;70 keV</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Image noise</strong></p></td><td><p>At <strong>70 keV</strong>, PCCT had lower noise than EID-CT: <strong>15.4 vs. 17.1 HU</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>70-keV comparison</strong></p></td><td><p>TLR and CNR were broadly comparable between PCCT and EID-CT</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>&lt;70-keV advantage</strong></p></td><td><p>PCCT provided <strong>higher CNR and greater lesion conspicuity</strong> than EID-CT</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>BMI effect</strong></p></td><td><p>At 70 keV, PCCT maintained similar noise in high- vs. low-BMI patients (<strong>15.8 vs. 15.3 HU</strong>)</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Dose/BMI relationship</strong></p></td><td><p>CTDI increased with BMI on both systems, but the increase was <strong>more pronounced with EID-CT</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Main implication</strong></p></td><td><p>Spectral PCCT allows low-keV VMI to increase iodine contrast and improve visualization of hypovascularized liver metastases while maintaining favorable noise characteristics, with a particular advantage in larger patients.</p></td></tr></table></div><p><strong>Source:</strong><br />
Bette S, Decker JA, Braun FM, Becker J, Haerting M, Haeckel T, Gebhard M, Risch F, Woźnicki P, Scheurig-Muenkler C, Kroencke TJ, Schwarz F. <em>Optimal Conspicuity of Liver Metastases in Virtual Monochromatic Imaging Reconstructions on a Novel Photon-Counting Detector CT—Effect of keV Settings and BMI.</em> Diagnostics. 2022;12(5):1231. doi:10.3390/diagnostics12051231.  </p>]]>
        </description>
    </item>
    <item>
        <title>(2025) Becker | Spectral PCCT differentiates hyperdense vascular from non-vascular renal lesions</title>
        <link>https://connect.siemens-healthineers.com/ja/discussion/467/2025-becker-spectral-pcct-differentiates-hyperdense-vascular-from-non-vascular-renal-lesions</link>
        <pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2026 06:28:57 +0000</pubDate>
        <category>Publication protocols</category>
        <dc:creator>Daniel Stromer</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">467@/ja/discussions</guid>
        <description><![CDATA[<div><div><p>This pilot study demonstrates that <strong>spectral information from photon-counting detector CT (PCD-CT)</strong> can help differentiate hyperdense renal cysts from vascular renal lesions when conventional portal-venous images are indeterminate. In <strong>26 patients with 42 hyperdense renal lesions</strong>, attenuation on standard <strong>70-keV VMI substantially overlapped</strong> between vascular and non-vascular lesions.</p><p></p><p><strong>Iodine quantification maps provided the strongest differentiation:</strong> non-vascular lesions measured <strong>5.7 ± 7.8 HU</strong> versus <strong>33.3 ± 19.0 HU</strong> for vascular lesions. A threshold of <strong>&gt;20.3 HU</strong> identified vascular lesions with <strong>87.5% sensitivity and 88.2% specificity</strong>, correctly identifying 7/8 vascular lesions. </p><p></p><p><strong>VNC was less specific</strong>: a 52-HU threshold achieved <strong>100% sensitivity but only 55.9% specificity</strong>. The results suggest that routinely available spectral PCD-CT data—particularly iodine maps—could potentially reduce additional true non-contrast or multiphasic imaging when an incidental hyperdense renal lesion is encountered, although validation in larger cohorts is required. </p></div></div><p><a href="https://connect.siemens-healthineers.com/ja/home/leaving?allowTrusted=1&amp;target=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.mdpi.com%2F2075-4418%2F15%2F1%2F79" rel="nofollow noopener ugc" role="button">Access publication</a></p><p></p><span data-embedjson="{&quot;url&quot;:&quot;https:\/\/us.v-cdn.net\/6038601\/uploads\/Y4URNF6JKL88\/image.png&quot;,&quot;name&quot;:&quot;image.png&quot;,&quot;type&quot;:&quot;image\/png&quot;,&quot;size&quot;:5828845,&quot;width&quot;:3965,&quot;height&quot;:2930,&quot;displaySize&quot;:&quot;large&quot;,&quot;float&quot;:&quot;none&quot;,&quot;downloadUrl&quot;:&quot;https:\/\/connect.siemens-healthineers.com\/api\/v2\/media\/download-by-url?url=https%3A%2F%2Fus.v-cdn.net%2F6038601%2Fuploads%2FY4URNF6JKL88%2Fimage.png&quot;,&quot;active&quot;:true,&quot;mediaID&quot;:1613,&quot;dateInserted&quot;:&quot;2026-08-08T06:27:56+00:00&quot;,&quot;insertUserID&quot;:14,&quot;foreignType&quot;:&quot;embed&quot;,&quot;foreignID&quot;:&quot;14&quot;,&quot;embedType&quot;:&quot;image&quot;,&quot;embedStyle&quot;:&quot;rich_embed_card&quot;}">
    <span>
        <a href="https://connect.siemens-healthineers.com/ja/home/leaving?allowTrusted=1&amp;target=https%3A%2F%2Fus.v-cdn.net%2F6038601%2Fuploads%2FY4URNF6JKL88%2Fimage.png" rel="nofollow noopener ugc" target="_blank">
            <img src="https://us.v-cdn.net/6038601/uploads/Y4URNF6JKL88/image.png" alt="image.png" height="2930" width="3965" data-display-size="large" data-float="none" data-type="image/png" data-embed-type="image" srcset="https://us.v-cdn.net/cdn-cgi/image/quality=80, format=auto, fit=scale-down, height=300, width=300/6038601/uploads/Y4URNF6JKL88/image.png 300w, https://us.v-cdn.net/cdn-cgi/image/quality=80, format=auto, fit=scale-down, height=600, width=600/6038601/uploads/Y4URNF6JKL88/image.png 600w, https://us.v-cdn.net/cdn-cgi/image/quality=80, format=auto, fit=scale-down, height=800, width=800/6038601/uploads/Y4URNF6JKL88/image.png 800w, https://us.v-cdn.net/cdn-cgi/image/quality=80, format=auto, fit=scale-down, height=1200, width=1200/6038601/uploads/Y4URNF6JKL88/image.png 1200w, https://us.v-cdn.net/cdn-cgi/image/quality=80, format=auto, fit=scale-down, height=1600, width=1600/6038601/uploads/Y4URNF6JKL88/image.png 1600w, https://us.v-cdn.net/cdn-cgi/image/quality=80, format=auto, fit=scale-down, height=2000, width=2000/6038601/uploads/Y4URNF6JKL88/image.png 2000w, https://us.v-cdn.net/6038601/uploads/Y4URNF6JKL88/image.png" sizes="100vw" /></a>
    </span>
</span>
<p><strong>Figure 3.</strong> (<strong>A</strong>): Axial 70 keV reconstruction as well as VNC and iodine maps of a left renal mass in a portal venous CT scan of the abdomen. The lesion shows elevated HU in 70 keV (75 HU), VNC values of 66 HU (<strong>B</strong>) and 13 HU for iodine map CT values (<strong>C</strong>). (<strong>D</strong>,<strong>E</strong>): Contrast-enhanced ultrasound confirmed that there was no contrast medium uptake. (<strong>F</strong>–<strong>H</strong>): Example of a renal mass without solid components and elevated CT values in iodine maps in comparison to the first patient (52 HU) and similar values in 70 keV reconstructions (86 HU) compared to the confirmed renal cyst (<strong>A</strong>). Contrast-enhanced ultrasound confirmed a contrast enhancement (green arrow in (<strong>I</strong>,<strong>J</strong>)) and histopathology revealed the diagnosis of a renal cell carcinoma. </p><p></p><h2 data-id="protocol">Protocol</h2><div><table><colgroup><col /><col /><col /></colgroup><tr><th><p>Detail</p></th><th><p>Value</p></th></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Scanner</strong></p></td><td><p>NAEOTOM Alpha</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Application</strong></p></td><td><p>Contrast-enhanced abdominal CT / characterization of hyperdense renal lesions</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Study population</strong></p></td><td><p>26 patients, 42 hyperdense renal lesions (&gt;20 HU)</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Acquisition mode</strong></p></td><td><p>QuantumPlus with spectral information</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Scan phase</strong></p></td><td><p>Portal venous phase</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Scan area</strong></p></td><td><p>Lung apex or diaphragm to symphysis</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Scan direction</strong></p></td><td><p>Craniocaudal</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Patient position</strong></p></td><td><p>Supine</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Breath-hold</strong></p></td><td><p>Single breath-hold</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Tube voltage</strong></p></td><td><p>120 kVp</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Tube current modulation</strong></p></td><td><p>CARE Dose4D</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Rotation time</strong></p></td><td><p>0.25 s</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Pitch</strong></p></td><td><p>0.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Collimation</strong></p></td><td><p>144 × 0.4 mm</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Slice thickness</strong></p></td><td><p>1.0 mm</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Reconstruction increment</strong></p></td><td><p>1.0 mm</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Reconstruction kernel</strong></p></td><td><p>Qr40</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Iterative reconstruction</strong></p></td><td><p>QIR 3</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Spectral postprocessing</strong></p></td><td><p>SPP</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>VMI</strong></p></td><td><p>70 keV</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Spectral reconstructions</strong></p></td><td><p>VNC and iodine quantification maps</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Workstation</strong></p></td><td><p>Syngo.Via VB60A</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Contrast agent</strong></p></td><td><p>Iopromide (Ultravist 300 mgI/mL)</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Contrast volume</strong></p></td><td><p>120 mL</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Saline chaser</strong></p></td><td><p>30 mL</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Flow rate</strong></p></td><td><p>4.0 mL/s</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Bolus triggering</strong></p></td><td><p>120 HU in ascending aorta</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Post-trigger delay</strong></p></td><td><p>45 s</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Image analysis</strong></p></td><td><p>Three ROI measurements per renal lesion; mean value used</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Reference standard</strong></p></td><td><p>TNC CT, ultrasound/CEUS, MRI/PET-CT, or histopathology</p></td></tr></table></div><p></p><h2 data-id="key-results">Key Results</h2><div><table><colgroup><col /><col /><col /></colgroup><tr><th><p>Parameter</p></th><th><p>Main finding</p></th></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Study cohort</strong></p></td><td><p>26 patients with 42 hyperdense renal lesions</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>70-keV VMI</strong></p></td><td><p>Substantial overlap between non-vascular (<strong>61.4 ± 19.4 HU</strong>) and vascular lesions (<strong>65.5 ± 17.4 HU</strong>); <em>p</em> = 1.000</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Iodine maps</strong></p></td><td><p>Non-vascular <strong>5.7 ± 7.8 HU</strong> vs vascular <strong>33.3 ± 19.0 HU</strong>; <em>p</em> = 0.002</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Iodine-map threshold</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>&gt;20.3 HU</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Iodine-map performance</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>87.5% sensitivity, 88.2% specificity</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Vascular lesions detected</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>7/8 (87.5%)</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>VNC values</strong></p></td><td><p>Non-vascular <strong>55.7 ± 24.2 HU</strong> vs vascular <strong>32.2 ± 11.1 HU</strong>; <em>p</em> = 0.034</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>VNC threshold</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>52 HU</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>VNC performance</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>100% sensitivity, 55.9% specificity</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>70-keV threshold</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>74 HU</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>70-keV performance</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>76.5% sensitivity, 50% specificity</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Best spectral feature</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Iodine quantification maps</strong> were the most important discriminator in random-forest feature selection</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Potential implication</strong></p></td><td><p>Spectral iodine information from routine PCD-CT may reduce the need for additional TNC or follow-up examinations in indeterminate hyperdense renal lesions, pending validation in larger studies</p></td></tr></table></div><p></p><p><strong>Source:</strong><br />
Becker J, Feitelson L-M, Risch F, Canalini L, Kaufmann D, Wudy R, Jehs B, Haerting M, Wollny C, Scheurig-Muenkler C, et al. <em>Spectral Differentiation of Hyperdense Non-Vascular and Vascular Renal Lesions Without Solid Components in Contrast-Enhanced Photon-Counting Detector CT Scans—A Pilot Study.</em> Diagnostics. 2025;15(1):79. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15010079 </p>]]>
        </description>
    </item>
    <item>
        <title>(2025) Dane | Follow-up recommendation rates with abdominopelvic PCCT vs EID dual/single energy</title>
        <link>https://connect.siemens-healthineers.com/ja/discussion/463/2025-dane-follow-up-recommendation-rates-with-abdominopelvic-pcct-vs-eid-dual-single-energy</link>
        <pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2026 05:27:24 +0000</pubDate>
        <category>Scientific publications</category>
        <dc:creator>Daniel Stromer</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">463@/ja/discussions</guid>
        <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://connect.siemens-healthineers.com/ja/home/leaving?allowTrusted=1&amp;target=https%3A%2F%2Fdoi.org%2F10.1007%2Fs00261-025-05343-7" rel="nofollow noopener ugc" role="button">Access publications</a></p><p><strong>Key takeaways</strong></p><div><div><p>For a cohort of 16,065 patients, PCCT significantly <strong>reduced follow-up imaging recommendations after contrast-enhanced abdominopelvic CT</strong> compared with conventional single-energy CT (SECT), with recommendation rates of 8.1% (PCCT), 8.7 (DECT) and 13.5% (SECT).</p><p><br />&#13;
Compared with SECT, PCCT substantially <strong>decreased recommendations for MRI</strong> (5.2% vs. 6.4%), <strong>CT</strong> (2.0% vs. 5.0%), and <strong>ultrasound </strong>(1.4% vs. 2.7%), reflecting greater diagnostic confidence and reducing unnecessary downstream imaging.</p><p><br />&#13;
The lower follow-up imaging rate translated into projected <strong>healthcare savings of nearly USD 115,000</strong>, highlighting the potential of PCCT to improve diagnostic efficiency while reducing healthcare costs.</p></div></div><p><br />&#13;Source: Dane B, Attlassy Y, Ihionkhan E, et al. Abdominal Radiology. 2026;51:3681–3689. doi:10.1007/s00261-025-05343-7.</p>]]>
        </description>
    </item>
    <item>
        <title>(2026) Yokoyama | Practical strategies to maximize the clinical impact of PCCT in abdominal imaging</title>
        <link>https://connect.siemens-healthineers.com/ja/discussion/442/2026-yokoyama-practical-strategies-to-maximize-the-clinical-impact-of-pcct-in-abdominal-imaging</link>
        <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2026 11:31:19 +0000</pubDate>
        <category>Publication protocols</category>
        <dc:creator>Daniel Stromer</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">442@/ja/discussions</guid>
        <description><![CDATA[<p><em>Note: This abdominal imaging deep dive paper does not specify scan protocols, but give an overview on clinical practice.</em></p><p><a href="https://connect.siemens-healthineers.com/ja/home/leaving?allowTrusted=1&amp;target=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.springermedizin.de%2Fseeing-the-invisible-practical-strategies-to-maximize-the-clinic%2F52896394" rel="nofollow noopener ugc" role="button">Access publication</a><em></em></p><p><em></em></p><span data-embedjson="{&quot;url&quot;:&quot;https:\/\/us.v-cdn.net\/6038601\/uploads\/CPHRAZNWT2OF\/image.png&quot;,&quot;name&quot;:&quot;image.png&quot;,&quot;type&quot;:&quot;image\/png&quot;,&quot;size&quot;:426717,&quot;width&quot;:834,&quot;height&quot;:522,&quot;displaySize&quot;:&quot;large&quot;,&quot;float&quot;:&quot;none&quot;,&quot;downloadUrl&quot;:&quot;https:\/\/connect.siemens-healthineers.com\/api\/v2\/media\/download-by-url?url=https%3A%2F%2Fus.v-cdn.net%2F6038601%2Fuploads%2FCPHRAZNWT2OF%2Fimage.png&quot;,&quot;active&quot;:true,&quot;mediaID&quot;:1533,&quot;dateInserted&quot;:&quot;2026-07-15T11:35:03+00:00&quot;,&quot;insertUserID&quot;:14,&quot;foreignType&quot;:&quot;embed&quot;,&quot;foreignID&quot;:&quot;14&quot;,&quot;embedType&quot;:&quot;image&quot;,&quot;embedStyle&quot;:&quot;rich_embed_card&quot;}">
    <span>
        <a href="https://connect.siemens-healthineers.com/ja/home/leaving?allowTrusted=1&amp;target=https%3A%2F%2Fus.v-cdn.net%2F6038601%2Fuploads%2FCPHRAZNWT2OF%2Fimage.png" rel="nofollow noopener ugc" target="_blank">
            <img src="https://us.v-cdn.net/6038601/uploads/CPHRAZNWT2OF/image.png" alt="image.png" height="522" width="834" data-display-size="large" data-float="none" data-type="image/png" data-embed-type="image" srcset="https://us.v-cdn.net/cdn-cgi/image/quality=80, format=auto, fit=scale-down, height=300, width=300/6038601/uploads/CPHRAZNWT2OF/image.png 300w, https://us.v-cdn.net/cdn-cgi/image/quality=80, format=auto, fit=scale-down, height=600, width=600/6038601/uploads/CPHRAZNWT2OF/image.png 600w, https://us.v-cdn.net/cdn-cgi/image/quality=80, format=auto, fit=scale-down, height=800, width=800/6038601/uploads/CPHRAZNWT2OF/image.png 800w, https://us.v-cdn.net/cdn-cgi/image/quality=80, format=auto, fit=scale-down, height=1200, width=1200/6038601/uploads/CPHRAZNWT2OF/image.png 1200w, https://us.v-cdn.net/cdn-cgi/image/quality=80, format=auto, fit=scale-down, height=1600, width=1600/6038601/uploads/CPHRAZNWT2OF/image.png 1600w, https://us.v-cdn.net/cdn-cgi/image/quality=80, format=auto, fit=scale-down, height=2000, width=2000/6038601/uploads/CPHRAZNWT2OF/image.png 2000w, https://us.v-cdn.net/6038601/uploads/CPHRAZNWT2OF/image.png" sizes="100vw" /></a>
    </span>
</span>
<p><strong>Figure 2. </strong>Early-stage pancreatic cancer was evaluated using a photon-counting detector CT. A 57-year-old female patient with suspected early-stage pancreatic cancer based on focal pancreatic atrophy on magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography underwent dynamic contrast-enhanced PCD-CT. In the arterial phase, 70 keV VMI (a) demonstrates focal atrophy and a subtle hypoattenuating area in the pancreatic tail. The lesion remains inconspicuous on 40 keV VMI (b), making its identification as a hypovascular tumor confidently challenging. In the equilibrium phase, faint delayed improvement is suspected on 70 keV VMI (c), which becomes more conspicuous on 40 keV VMI (d) (yellow arrows). Cinematic volume-rendered images reconstructed from arterial-phase 40 keV VMI data (e, f) clearly depict focal atrophy of the pancreatic tail (arrowheads). Detecting early-stage pancreatic cancer may be challenging in the arterial phase; therefore, findings, including focal parenchymal atrophy and delayed enhancement, are important. PCD-CT is particularly advantageous for detecting these subtle features</p><p></p><span data-embedjson="{&quot;url&quot;:&quot;https:\/\/us.v-cdn.net\/6038601\/uploads\/YJBJ7C7IV2LM\/image.png&quot;,&quot;name&quot;:&quot;image.png&quot;,&quot;type&quot;:&quot;image\/png&quot;,&quot;size&quot;:750072,&quot;width&quot;:1016,&quot;height&quot;:594,&quot;displaySize&quot;:&quot;large&quot;,&quot;float&quot;:&quot;none&quot;,&quot;downloadUrl&quot;:&quot;https:\/\/connect.siemens-healthineers.com\/api\/v2\/media\/download-by-url?url=https%3A%2F%2Fus.v-cdn.net%2F6038601%2Fuploads%2FYJBJ7C7IV2LM%2Fimage.png&quot;,&quot;active&quot;:true,&quot;mediaID&quot;:1532,&quot;dateInserted&quot;:&quot;2026-07-15T11:32:24+00:00&quot;,&quot;insertUserID&quot;:14,&quot;foreignType&quot;:&quot;embed&quot;,&quot;foreignID&quot;:&quot;14&quot;,&quot;embedType&quot;:&quot;image&quot;,&quot;embedStyle&quot;:&quot;rich_embed_card&quot;}">
    <span>
        <a href="https://connect.siemens-healthineers.com/ja/home/leaving?allowTrusted=1&amp;target=https%3A%2F%2Fus.v-cdn.net%2F6038601%2Fuploads%2FYJBJ7C7IV2LM%2Fimage.png" rel="nofollow noopener ugc" target="_blank">
            <img src="https://us.v-cdn.net/6038601/uploads/YJBJ7C7IV2LM/image.png" alt="image.png" height="594" width="1016" data-display-size="large" data-float="none" data-type="image/png" data-embed-type="image" srcset="https://us.v-cdn.net/cdn-cgi/image/quality=80, format=auto, fit=scale-down, height=300, width=300/6038601/uploads/YJBJ7C7IV2LM/image.png 300w, https://us.v-cdn.net/cdn-cgi/image/quality=80, format=auto, fit=scale-down, height=600, width=600/6038601/uploads/YJBJ7C7IV2LM/image.png 600w, https://us.v-cdn.net/cdn-cgi/image/quality=80, format=auto, fit=scale-down, height=800, width=800/6038601/uploads/YJBJ7C7IV2LM/image.png 800w, https://us.v-cdn.net/cdn-cgi/image/quality=80, format=auto, fit=scale-down, height=1200, width=1200/6038601/uploads/YJBJ7C7IV2LM/image.png 1200w, https://us.v-cdn.net/cdn-cgi/image/quality=80, format=auto, fit=scale-down, height=1600, width=1600/6038601/uploads/YJBJ7C7IV2LM/image.png 1600w, https://us.v-cdn.net/cdn-cgi/image/quality=80, format=auto, fit=scale-down, height=2000, width=2000/6038601/uploads/YJBJ7C7IV2LM/image.png 2000w, https://us.v-cdn.net/6038601/uploads/YJBJ7C7IV2LM/image.png" sizes="100vw" /></a>
    </span>
</span>
<p><em>Partially AI-generated overview</em></p><p><em></em></p><h3 data-id="uhr-pcct-in-abdominal-imaging">UHR PCCT in abdominal imaging</h3><ul><li><strong>UHR PCCT</strong> enables slice thicknesses down to <strong>0.2 mm</strong>, improving visualization of small vessels, pancreatic ducts, urinary calculi, and other fine anatomical structures while reducing blooming artifacts.</li><li>The greatest clinical benefit is seen in <strong>CT angiography</strong>, interventional planning, urinary stone detection, and evaluation of calcified or high-contrast structures, whereas improvements for low-contrast abdominal lesions remain more limited.</li><li>A <strong>dual-reconstruction workflow</strong> is recommended, using standard-resolution images for routine interpretation and targeted UHR reconstructions for problem-solving applications requiring maximum spatial detail (see reconstruction).</li></ul><h3 data-id="spectral-imaging">Spectral imaging</h3><ul><li><strong>Spectral imaging is inherently available in every PCCT examination with specific scan modes</strong>, enabling retrospective reconstruction of virtual monoenergetic images (VMIs), iodine maps, and material decomposition without dedicated dual-energy acquisition.</li><li><strong>Low-keV VMIs (40–50 keV)</strong> substantially enhance iodine contrast, improving visualization of hypervascular and hypovascular lesions, while <strong>70 keV</strong> closely resembles conventional CT and serves as the preferred routine reconstruction.</li><li>Spectral imaging also supports <strong>virtual non-contrast (VNC)</strong> imaging, quantitative iodine mapping, and contrast-media reduction strategies while maintaining diagnostic image quality.</li></ul><h3 data-id="clinical-impact-of-spectral-imaging">Clinical impact of spectral imaging</h3><ul><li>Low-keV VMIs improve detection and characterization of <strong>pancreatic cancer, liver metastases, rectal cancer, inflammatory diseases, and vascular abnormalities</strong> by increasing lesion conspicuity and tissue contrast.</li><li>Quantitative <strong>iodine density maps</strong> provide functional information that may serve as imaging biomarkers for tumor perfusion, treatment response, inflammatory activity, and lymph node assessment.</li><li>The combination of high-resolution anatomical imaging and routine spectral information supports the concept of <strong>"one-stop imaging"</strong>, potentially reducing additional CT or MRI examinations in selected clinical scenarios.</li></ul><h3 data-id="reconstruction-strategies-and-optimization">Reconstruction strategies and optimization</h3><ul><li><strong>70-keV VMI</strong> with medium-soft kernels is recommended for routine abdominal interpretation because it closely matches conventional CT while preserving access to spectral information.</li><li><strong>Task-specific reconstructions</strong> using <strong>40–50 keV VMIs</strong>, sharper kernels, thinner slices, and higher Quantum Iterative Reconstruction (QIR) levels improve lesion conspicuity and vascular visualization when clinically indicated.</li><li>Optimizing <strong>kernel selection, slice thickness, matrix size, and QIR</strong> is essential to balance spatial resolution, image noise, and diagnostic confidence for different abdominal imaging tasks.<br /><em>"Accordingly, dual reconstruction is common in clinical practice. A routine reconstruction consisting of 70-keV VMI, a medium-smooth vascular kernel (Br40–44 or Bv36), moderate QIR (QIR-2 or 3), and a slice thickness of ~0.6 mm provide stable texture and noise control for routine interpretation. Additional task-specific reconstructions may employ lower-keV VMIs (e.g., 40 keV), sharper kernels (Bv72), higher QIR (QIR-4), thinner slices (~0.2 mm), and larger matrices (e.g., 1024, 2048) for problem-solving or high-resolution evaluation."</em></li></ul><span data-embedjson="{&quot;url&quot;:&quot;https:\/\/us.v-cdn.net\/6038601\/uploads\/606NWU36Q12B\/image.png&quot;,&quot;name&quot;:&quot;image.png&quot;,&quot;type&quot;:&quot;image\/png&quot;,&quot;size&quot;:76557,&quot;width&quot;:628,&quot;height&quot;:981,&quot;displaySize&quot;:&quot;medium&quot;,&quot;float&quot;:&quot;none&quot;,&quot;downloadUrl&quot;:&quot;https:\/\/connect.siemens-healthineers.com\/api\/v2\/media\/download-by-url?url=https%3A%2F%2Fus.v-cdn.net%2F6038601%2Fuploads%2F606NWU36Q12B%2Fimage.png&quot;,&quot;active&quot;:true,&quot;mediaID&quot;:1539,&quot;dateInserted&quot;:&quot;2026-07-15T13:15:18+00:00&quot;,&quot;insertUserID&quot;:14,&quot;foreignType&quot;:&quot;embed&quot;,&quot;foreignID&quot;:&quot;14&quot;,&quot;embedType&quot;:&quot;image&quot;,&quot;embedStyle&quot;:&quot;rich_embed_card&quot;}">
    <span>
        <a href="https://connect.siemens-healthineers.com/ja/home/leaving?allowTrusted=1&amp;target=https%3A%2F%2Fus.v-cdn.net%2F6038601%2Fuploads%2F606NWU36Q12B%2Fimage.png" rel="nofollow noopener ugc" target="_blank">
            <img src="https://us.v-cdn.net/6038601/uploads/606NWU36Q12B/image.png" alt="image.png" height="981" width="628" data-display-size="medium" data-float="none" data-type="image/png" data-embed-type="image" srcset="https://us.v-cdn.net/cdn-cgi/image/quality=80, format=auto, fit=scale-down, height=300, width=300/6038601/uploads/606NWU36Q12B/image.png 300w, https://us.v-cdn.net/cdn-cgi/image/quality=80, format=auto, fit=scale-down, height=600, width=600/6038601/uploads/606NWU36Q12B/image.png 600w, https://us.v-cdn.net/cdn-cgi/image/quality=80, format=auto, fit=scale-down, height=800, width=800/6038601/uploads/606NWU36Q12B/image.png 800w, https://us.v-cdn.net/cdn-cgi/image/quality=80, format=auto, fit=scale-down, height=1200, width=1200/6038601/uploads/606NWU36Q12B/image.png 1200w, https://us.v-cdn.net/cdn-cgi/image/quality=80, format=auto, fit=scale-down, height=1600, width=1600/6038601/uploads/606NWU36Q12B/image.png 1600w, https://us.v-cdn.net/cdn-cgi/image/quality=80, format=auto, fit=scale-down, height=2000, width=2000/6038601/uploads/606NWU36Q12B/image.png 2000w, https://us.v-cdn.net/6038601/uploads/606NWU36Q12B/image.png" sizes="100vw" /></a>
    </span>
</span>
<h3 data-id="implementation-considerations-data-management-and-infrastructure">Implementation considerations: data management and infrastructure</h3><ul><li>Routine <strong>PCCT</strong> generates substantially larger datasets than conventional CT due to thin-slice acquisitions, high-resolution matrices, and multiple spectral reconstructions, requiring significantly greater storage and computational resources.</li><li>Successful implementation requires <strong>optimized PACS infrastructure, selective archiving strategies, network capacity, and efficient spectral data management</strong> to prevent workflow bottlenecks.</li><li>Institutions should view <strong>PCCT implementation as a system-wide workflow transformation</strong>, rather than simply replacing an existing CT scanner.</li></ul><h3 data-id="future-perspectives">Future perspectives</h3><ul><li>Future <strong>multi-energy PCCT</strong> systems are expected to expand quantitative imaging through improved material decomposition, electron density mapping, extracellular volume (ECV) assessment, and <strong>K-edge imaging</strong>.</li><li>Emerging applications include <strong>molecular imaging, virtual non-calcium imaging, automated tissue characterization, and AI-assisted quantitative biomarkers</strong>, extending CT beyond morphology-based diagnosis.</li><li>Wider adoption will depend on demonstrating <strong>clinical value, cost-effectiveness, multivendor standardization, and robust quantitative reproducibility</strong> across different PCCT platforms.</li></ul><p><strong>Source:</strong> Yokoyama K, Kawasaki Y, Fujii M, <em>et al.</em> <em>Abdominal Radiology.</em> 2026.</p>]]>
        </description>
    </item>
    <item>
        <title>(2025) Braaksma | Pediatric abdomen PCCT protocol development</title>
        <link>https://connect.siemens-healthineers.com/ja/discussion/350/2025-braaksma-pediatric-abdomen-pcct-protocol-development</link>
        <pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2026 14:19:13 +0000</pubDate>
        <category>Publication protocols</category>
        <dc:creator>Daniel Stromer</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">350@/ja/discussions</guid>
        <description><![CDATA[<div><div><p>For routine pediatric abdomen PCCT, start with Quantum mode at 70 kV and low-keV VMI rather than defaulting to QuantumPlus. Based on their phantom work, the authors favor the lowest tube voltage as the ALARA-oriented starting point, and for their standard protocol they selected 70 kV Quantum mode with VMI 53 keV.</p><p><br />
Optimize image quality first through reconstruction settings before increasing acquisition dose. The authors recommend first adjusting QIR strength, kernel choice, and windowing if noise is too high, and only then considering higher IQ level, DAC changes, or QuantumPlus mode.</p><p><br />
Use high-pitch FLASH selectively, not routinely. The authors found FLASH shortened scan time but slightly increased noise and dose, so they recommend it mainly for children who cannot hold their breath long enough for a standard scan.</p></div></div><p><a href="https://connect.siemens-healthineers.com/ja/home/leaving?allowTrusted=1&amp;target=https%3A%2F%2Flink.springer.com%2Farticle%2F10.1007%2Fs00247-025-06274-7" rel="nofollow noopener ugc" role="button">Access publication</a></p><span data-embedjson="{&quot;url&quot;:&quot;https:\/\/us.v-cdn.net\/6038601\/uploads\/2T3J4MAENTLK\/image.png&quot;,&quot;name&quot;:&quot;image.png&quot;,&quot;type&quot;:&quot;image\/png&quot;,&quot;size&quot;:884483,&quot;width&quot;:2032,&quot;height&quot;:530,&quot;displaySize&quot;:&quot;large&quot;,&quot;float&quot;:&quot;none&quot;,&quot;downloadUrl&quot;:&quot;https:\/\/connect.siemens-healthineers.com\/api\/v2\/media\/download-by-url?url=https%3A%2F%2Fus.v-cdn.net%2F6038601%2Fuploads%2F2T3J4MAENTLK%2Fimage.png&quot;,&quot;active&quot;:true,&quot;mediaID&quot;:1288,&quot;dateInserted&quot;:&quot;2026-04-10T14:10:53+00:00&quot;,&quot;insertUserID&quot;:14,&quot;foreignType&quot;:&quot;embed&quot;,&quot;foreignID&quot;:&quot;14&quot;,&quot;embedType&quot;:&quot;image&quot;,&quot;embedStyle&quot;:&quot;rich_embed_card&quot;}">
    <span>
        <a href="https://connect.siemens-healthineers.com/ja/home/leaving?allowTrusted=1&amp;target=https%3A%2F%2Fus.v-cdn.net%2F6038601%2Fuploads%2F2T3J4MAENTLK%2Fimage.png" rel="nofollow noopener ugc" target="_blank">
            <img src="https://us.v-cdn.net/6038601/uploads/2T3J4MAENTLK/image.png" alt="image.png" height="530" width="2032" data-display-size="large" data-float="none" data-type="image/png" data-embed-type="image" srcset="https://us.v-cdn.net/cdn-cgi/image/quality=80, format=auto, fit=scale-down, height=300, width=300/6038601/uploads/2T3J4MAENTLK/image.png 300w, https://us.v-cdn.net/cdn-cgi/image/quality=80, format=auto, fit=scale-down, height=600, width=600/6038601/uploads/2T3J4MAENTLK/image.png 600w, https://us.v-cdn.net/cdn-cgi/image/quality=80, format=auto, fit=scale-down, height=800, width=800/6038601/uploads/2T3J4MAENTLK/image.png 800w, https://us.v-cdn.net/cdn-cgi/image/quality=80, format=auto, fit=scale-down, height=1200, width=1200/6038601/uploads/2T3J4MAENTLK/image.png 1200w, https://us.v-cdn.net/cdn-cgi/image/quality=80, format=auto, fit=scale-down, height=1600, width=1600/6038601/uploads/2T3J4MAENTLK/image.png 1600w, https://us.v-cdn.net/cdn-cgi/image/quality=80, format=auto, fit=scale-down, height=2000, width=2000/6038601/uploads/2T3J4MAENTLK/image.png 2000w, https://us.v-cdn.net/6038601/uploads/2T3J4MAENTLK/image.png" sizes="100vw" /></a>
    </span>
</span>
<p><strong>Figure 5. </strong>Examples of the clinical implementation of the pediatric abdomen protocol. Axial computed tomography slices in the portal venous phase after intravenous contrast demonstrate the appearances of contrast and noise of the protocol at different ages. Protocol: 70 kV Quantum mode at 53 keV virtual monoenergetic image, IQ level 120, body reconstruction kernel 40, quantum iterative reconstruction 2, 1.0-mm slice thickness. a Six-month-old girl after liver transplantation. b Two-year-old girl prior to liver transplantation. c Six-year-old boy after liver transplantation</p><p><em>Source note for image: Braaksma et al.,</em> Pediatric Radiology, <em>2025.</em></p><p></p><h2 data-id="standard-protocol"><strong>Standard Protocol</strong></h2><div><table><colgroup><col /><col /><col /></colgroup><tr><th><p>Parameter</p></th><td><p></p></td></tr><tr><th><p>Scanner</p></th><td><p>NAEOTOM Alpha</p></td></tr><tr><th><p>Scan mode</p></th><td><p>Quantum</p></td></tr><tr><th><p>Siemens protocol</p></th><td><p>RoutineFlashSpiralChildAbdomenQuantum</p></td></tr><tr><th><p>Tube voltage, kV</p></th><td><p>70/90</p></td></tr><tr><th><p>Number of slices, mm</p></th><td><p>144 × 0.4</p></td></tr><tr><th><p>Z-coverage, mm</p></th><td><p>58</p></td></tr><tr><th><p>Rotation time, s</p></th><td><p>0.25</p></td></tr><tr><th><p>IQ level</p></th><td><p>120</p></td></tr><tr><th><p>Pitch</p></th><td><p>3.2 (FLASH) or 1.5</p></td></tr><tr><th><p>Care keV</p></th><td><p>On</p></td></tr><tr><th><p>CARE Dose4D</p></th><td><p>On</p></td></tr><tr><th><p>Dose adaption curve</p></th><td><p>Average</p></td></tr><tr><th><p>Tissue of interest setting</p></th><td><p>Soft tissue with contrast</p></td></tr></table></div><h4 data-id="n-a"><strong></strong></h4><div><table><colgroup><col /><col /><col /></colgroup><tr><th><p>Reconstruction parameters</p></th><td><p></p></td></tr><tr><th><p>Reconstructed slice thickness, mm</p></th><td><p>1.0 and 3.0 (0.6 and 2.0 increment)</p></td></tr><tr><th><p>Matrix</p></th><td><p>Auto</p></td></tr><tr><th><p>VMI, keV</p></th><td><p>53</p></td></tr><tr><th><p>Kernels</p></th><td><p>Br40 (1 mm), Br40 (3 mm)</p></td></tr><tr><th><p>QIR</p></th><td><p>2</p></td></tr><tr><th><p>Window level / window width</p></th><td><p>55 / 335</p></td></tr><tr><th><p>Spectral analysis</p></th><td><p>No</p></td></tr><tr><th><p></p><p><strong>Intravenous iodine contrast</strong></p></th><td><p></p></td></tr><tr><th><p>Contrast phase</p></th><td><p>Portal venous, delay is age dependent</p></td></tr><tr><th><p>Volume and flow rate</p></th><td><p>Age and kV dependent</p></td></tr></table></div><p></p><h2 data-id="complex-protocol-not-used-clinically-optimized-for-noise-thinner-slices"><strong>Complex Protocol (not used clinically, optimized for noise &amp; thinner slices)</strong></h2><div><table><colgroup><col /><col /><col /></colgroup><tr><th><p>Parameter</p></th><td><p><strong>Value</strong></p></td></tr><tr><th><p>Scanner</p></th><td><p>NAEOTOM Alpha</p></td></tr><tr><th><p>Scan mode</p></th><td><p>QuantumPlus</p></td></tr><tr><th><p>Siemens protocol</p></th><td><p>RoutineFlashSpiralChildAbdomenQuantumplus</p></td></tr><tr><th><p>Tube voltage, kV</p></th><td><p>120/140</p></td></tr><tr><th><p>Number of slices, mm</p></th><td><p>144 × 0.4</p></td></tr><tr><th><p>Z-coverage, mm</p></th><td><p>58</p></td></tr><tr><th><p>Rotation time, s</p></th><td><p>0.25</p></td></tr><tr><th><p>IQ level</p></th><td><p>120</p></td></tr><tr><th><p>Pitch</p></th><td><p>3.2 (FLASH) or 1.5</p></td></tr><tr><th><p>Care keV</p></th><td><p>On</p></td></tr><tr><th><p>CARE Dose4D</p></th><td><p>On</p></td></tr><tr><th><p>Dose adaption curve</p></th><td><p>Average</p></td></tr><tr><th><p>Tissue of interest setting</p></th><td><p>Soft tissue with contrast</p></td></tr></table></div><h3 data-id="n-a-1"><strong></strong></h3><div><table><colgroup><col /><col /><col /></colgroup><tr><th><p>Reconstruction parameters</p></th><td><p></p></td></tr><tr><th><p>Reconstructed slice thickness, mm</p></th><td><p>0.4, 1.0 and 3.0 (0.3, 0.6 and 2.0 increment)</p></td></tr><tr><th><p>Matrix</p></th><td><p>Auto</p></td></tr><tr><th><p>VMI, keV</p></th><td><p>53 (T3D for non-contrast if needed)</p></td></tr><tr><th><p>Kernels</p></th><td><p>Br40 (1 mm), Br40 (3 mm), Bv60 (0.4, 1 mm)</p></td></tr><tr><th><p>QIR</p></th><td><p>2</p></td></tr><tr><th><p>Window level / window width</p></th><td><p>55 / 335</p></td></tr><tr><th><p>Spectral analysis</p></th><td><p>Iodine map, virtual non-contrast</p></td></tr><tr><th><p><strong>Intravenous iodine contrast</strong></p></th><td><p></p></td></tr><tr><th><p>Contrast phase</p></th><td><p>Portal venous, delay is age dependent</p></td></tr><tr><th><p>Volume and flow rate</p></th><td><p>Age and kV dependent</p></td></tr></table></div><p></p><p><strong>Full citation:</strong><br />
Braaksma J, Greuter MJW, Verhagen MV. Physics and rationale in pediatric abdomen photon counting detector computed tomography: an investigative review towards development of a pediatric abdomen protocol. <em>Pediatr Radiol.</em> 2025;55:1556–1567. doi:10.1007/s00247-025-06274-7</p>]]>
        </description>
    </item>
    <item>
        <title>(2024) Tóth | Iodine quantification differentiates renal cysts vs tumors on PCCT</title>
        <link>https://connect.siemens-healthineers.com/ja/discussion/345/2024-toth-iodine-quantification-differentiates-renal-cysts-vs-tumors-on-pcct</link>
        <pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2026 11:54:14 +0000</pubDate>
        <category>Publication protocols</category>
        <dc:creator>Daniel Stromer</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">345@/ja/discussions</guid>
        <description><![CDATA[<div><div><p>Automated iodine maps on PCCT showed strong diagnostic performance to differentiate renal cysts from neoplasms, with AUC up to 0.99.</p><p></p><p>Renal cysts consistently demonstrated near-zero iodine concentration, while neoplasms showed higher and more heterogeneous iodine values.</p><p></p><p>Minimum iodine concentration in suspicious regions was particularly powerful, nearly perfectly separating benign vs malignant lesions.</p></div></div><p><a href="https://connect.siemens-healthineers.com/ja/home/leaving?allowTrusted=1&amp;target=https%3A%2F%2Fpmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov%2Farticles%2FPMC11021115%2F" rel="nofollow noopener ugc" role="button">Access publication</a></p><span data-embedjson="{&quot;url&quot;:&quot;https:\/\/us.v-cdn.net\/6038601\/uploads\/GGG4TCAVUNOQ\/image.png&quot;,&quot;name&quot;:&quot;image.png&quot;,&quot;type&quot;:&quot;image\/png&quot;,&quot;size&quot;:305163,&quot;width&quot;:756,&quot;height&quot;:359,&quot;displaySize&quot;:&quot;large&quot;,&quot;float&quot;:&quot;none&quot;,&quot;downloadUrl&quot;:&quot;https:\/\/connect.siemens-healthineers.com\/api\/v2\/media\/download-by-url?url=https%3A%2F%2Fus.v-cdn.net%2F6038601%2Fuploads%2FGGG4TCAVUNOQ%2Fimage.png&quot;,&quot;active&quot;:true,&quot;mediaID&quot;:1277,&quot;dateInserted&quot;:&quot;2026-04-10T11:51:30+00:00&quot;,&quot;insertUserID&quot;:14,&quot;foreignType&quot;:&quot;embed&quot;,&quot;foreignID&quot;:&quot;14&quot;,&quot;embedType&quot;:&quot;image&quot;,&quot;embedStyle&quot;:&quot;rich_embed_card&quot;}">
    <span>
        <a href="https://connect.siemens-healthineers.com/ja/home/leaving?allowTrusted=1&amp;target=https%3A%2F%2Fus.v-cdn.net%2F6038601%2Fuploads%2FGGG4TCAVUNOQ%2Fimage.png" rel="nofollow noopener ugc" target="_blank">
            <img src="https://us.v-cdn.net/6038601/uploads/GGG4TCAVUNOQ/image.png" alt="image.png" height="359" width="756" data-display-size="large" data-float="none" data-type="image/png" data-embed-type="image" srcset="https://us.v-cdn.net/cdn-cgi/image/quality=80, format=auto, fit=scale-down, height=300, width=300/6038601/uploads/GGG4TCAVUNOQ/image.png 300w, https://us.v-cdn.net/cdn-cgi/image/quality=80, format=auto, fit=scale-down, height=600, width=600/6038601/uploads/GGG4TCAVUNOQ/image.png 600w, https://us.v-cdn.net/cdn-cgi/image/quality=80, format=auto, fit=scale-down, height=800, width=800/6038601/uploads/GGG4TCAVUNOQ/image.png 800w, https://us.v-cdn.net/cdn-cgi/image/quality=80, format=auto, fit=scale-down, height=1200, width=1200/6038601/uploads/GGG4TCAVUNOQ/image.png 1200w, https://us.v-cdn.net/cdn-cgi/image/quality=80, format=auto, fit=scale-down, height=1600, width=1600/6038601/uploads/GGG4TCAVUNOQ/image.png 1600w, https://us.v-cdn.net/cdn-cgi/image/quality=80, format=auto, fit=scale-down, height=2000, width=2000/6038601/uploads/GGG4TCAVUNOQ/image.png 2000w, https://us.v-cdn.net/6038601/uploads/GGG4TCAVUNOQ/image.png" sizes="100vw" /></a>
    </span>
</span>
<p><strong>Figure 2.</strong> (a) A 86-year-old female who presented with abdominal pain. Reconstructed iodine quantification map of the axial CT image shows the left kidney with renal cyst. For homogeneous lesions, one ROI was placed in the interior of the renal lesion, as large as possible to cover the entire lesion (yellow arrow pointing to the ROI shown as yellow circle). (b) A 64-year-old female presented for RCC staging. A reconstructed iodine quantification map of the axial CT image shows the right kidney with renal neoplasm. For heterogeneous lesions, after the placement of the first ROI (yellow arrow pointing to the ROI shown as yellow circle), a secondary ROI (yellow star marking the ROI shown as yellow circle) was placed on the area of the highest conspicuity of iodine concentration. (CT: Computed tomography, RCC: Renal cell carcinoma, ROI: Region of interest).</p><p>Source: Tóth et al., <em>Journal of Clinical Imaging Science</em>, 2024</p><p></p><h3 data-id="protocol">Protocol</h3><div><table><colgroup><col /><col /><col /></colgroup><tr><th><p>Detail</p></th><th><p>Value</p></th></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Scanner</strong></p></td><td><p>NAEOTOM Alpha</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Scan area</strong></p></td><td><p>Abdomen</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Scan mode</strong></p></td><td><p>QuantumPlus </p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Tube voltage [kV]</strong></p></td><td><p>120</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Effective mAs [mAs]</strong></p></td><td><p>184.9 ± 77.3</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>IQ level</strong></p></td><td><p>249</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Dose modulation</strong></p></td><td><p>CARE Dose4D</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>CTDIvol [mGy]</strong></p></td><td><p>15.2 ± 6.6</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>DLP [mGy*cm]</strong></p></td><td><p>1020.5 ± 608.0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Rotation time [s]</strong></p></td><td><p>0.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Pitch</strong></p></td><td><p>0.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Matrix</strong></p></td><td><p>512 × 512</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Slice collimation [mm]</strong></p></td><td><p>144 × 3</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Slice width [mm]</strong></p></td><td><p>3 </p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>keV level [keV]</strong></p></td><td><p>n.a.</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Contrast agent</strong></p></td><td><p>Omnipaque 350 mgI/mL</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Contrast volume</strong></p></td><td><p>1.25 ± 0.13 mL/kg</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Flow rate</strong></p></td><td><p>2.96 ± 0.59 mL/s</p></td></tr></table></div><p>Tóth A, Chamberlin JH, Mendez S, Varga-Szemes A, Hardie AD. <strong>Iodine quantification of renal lesions: Preliminary results using spectral-based material extraction on photon-counting CT.</strong> <em>J Clin Imaging Sci.</em> 2024;14:7. doi:10.25259/JCIS_1_2024</p>]]>
        </description>
    </item>
    <item>
        <title>(2024) Hoeijmakers | PCCT enables contrast media reduction in abdominal imaging</title>
        <link>https://connect.siemens-healthineers.com/ja/discussion/344/2024-hoeijmakers-pcct-enables-contrast-media-reduction-in-abdominal-imaging</link>
        <pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2026 11:48:02 +0000</pubDate>
        <category>Publication protocols</category>
        <dc:creator>Daniel Stromer</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">344@/ja/discussions</guid>
        <description><![CDATA[<div><div><p>PCCT reduced total iodine load by 20.1% for abdominal portal venous phase CT compared with an individualized kV-adapted EID-CT protocol, while maintaining diagnostic image quality.</p><p></p><p>Despite lower liver attenuation at the standard 60 keV reconstruction, PCCT achieved significantly higher SNR and CNR than EID-CT.</p><p></p><p>All scans on both systems were rated as diagnostically sufficient by both readers.</p></div></div><p><a href="https://connect.siemens-healthineers.com/ja/home/leaving?allowTrusted=1&amp;target=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.sciencedirect.com%2Fscience%2Farticle%2Fpii%2FS0720048X24003966" rel="nofollow noopener ugc" role="button">Access the publication</a></p><span data-embedjson="{&quot;url&quot;:&quot;https:\/\/us.v-cdn.net\/6038601\/uploads\/MOMQUVQLKAZM\/image.png&quot;,&quot;name&quot;:&quot;image.png&quot;,&quot;type&quot;:&quot;image\/png&quot;,&quot;size&quot;:251844,&quot;width&quot;:689,&quot;height&quot;:360,&quot;displaySize&quot;:&quot;medium&quot;,&quot;float&quot;:&quot;none&quot;,&quot;downloadUrl&quot;:&quot;https:\/\/connect.siemens-healthineers.com\/api\/v2\/media\/download-by-url?url=https%3A%2F%2Fus.v-cdn.net%2F6038601%2Fuploads%2FMOMQUVQLKAZM%2Fimage.png&quot;,&quot;active&quot;:true,&quot;mediaID&quot;:1275,&quot;dateInserted&quot;:&quot;2026-04-10T11:41:39+00:00&quot;,&quot;insertUserID&quot;:14,&quot;foreignType&quot;:&quot;embed&quot;,&quot;foreignID&quot;:&quot;14&quot;,&quot;embedType&quot;:&quot;image&quot;,&quot;embedStyle&quot;:&quot;rich_embed_card&quot;}">
    <span>
        <a href="https://connect.siemens-healthineers.com/ja/home/leaving?allowTrusted=1&amp;target=https%3A%2F%2Fus.v-cdn.net%2F6038601%2Fuploads%2FMOMQUVQLKAZM%2Fimage.png" rel="nofollow noopener ugc" target="_blank">
            <img src="https://us.v-cdn.net/6038601/uploads/MOMQUVQLKAZM/image.png" alt="image.png" height="360" width="689" data-display-size="medium" data-float="none" data-type="image/png" data-embed-type="image" srcset="https://us.v-cdn.net/cdn-cgi/image/quality=80, format=auto, fit=scale-down, height=300, width=300/6038601/uploads/MOMQUVQLKAZM/image.png 300w, https://us.v-cdn.net/cdn-cgi/image/quality=80, format=auto, fit=scale-down, height=600, width=600/6038601/uploads/MOMQUVQLKAZM/image.png 600w, https://us.v-cdn.net/cdn-cgi/image/quality=80, format=auto, fit=scale-down, height=800, width=800/6038601/uploads/MOMQUVQLKAZM/image.png 800w, https://us.v-cdn.net/cdn-cgi/image/quality=80, format=auto, fit=scale-down, height=1200, width=1200/6038601/uploads/MOMQUVQLKAZM/image.png 1200w, https://us.v-cdn.net/cdn-cgi/image/quality=80, format=auto, fit=scale-down, height=1600, width=1600/6038601/uploads/MOMQUVQLKAZM/image.png 1600w, https://us.v-cdn.net/cdn-cgi/image/quality=80, format=auto, fit=scale-down, height=2000, width=2000/6038601/uploads/MOMQUVQLKAZM/image.png 2000w, https://us.v-cdn.net/6038601/uploads/MOMQUVQLKAZM/image.png" sizes="100vw" /></a>
    </span>
</span>
<p><strong>Figure 3.</strong> Representative abdominal PVP scans from both a photon-counting detector CT (PCCT) and an energy-integrating detector CT (EID-CT), illustrating comparable image quality (IQ). Image A and B were rated as moderate and image D and E as good by both observers. Image C and F are the 55 keV reconstructions of image B and E respectively but were not assessed subjectively.</p><span data-embedjson="{&quot;url&quot;:&quot;https:\/\/us.v-cdn.net\/6038601\/uploads\/IODNVI4RRZAW\/image.png&quot;,&quot;name&quot;:&quot;image.png&quot;,&quot;type&quot;:&quot;image\/png&quot;,&quot;size&quot;:47926,&quot;width&quot;:656,&quot;height&quot;:394,&quot;displaySize&quot;:&quot;medium&quot;,&quot;float&quot;:&quot;none&quot;,&quot;downloadUrl&quot;:&quot;https:\/\/connect.siemens-healthineers.com\/api\/v2\/media\/download-by-url?url=https%3A%2F%2Fus.v-cdn.net%2F6038601%2Fuploads%2FIODNVI4RRZAW%2Fimage.png&quot;,&quot;active&quot;:true,&quot;mediaID&quot;:1276,&quot;dateInserted&quot;:&quot;2026-04-10T11:47:53+00:00&quot;,&quot;insertUserID&quot;:14,&quot;foreignType&quot;:&quot;embed&quot;,&quot;foreignID&quot;:&quot;14&quot;,&quot;embedType&quot;:&quot;image&quot;,&quot;embedStyle&quot;:&quot;rich_embed_card&quot;}">
    <span>
        <a href="https://connect.siemens-healthineers.com/ja/home/leaving?allowTrusted=1&amp;target=https%3A%2F%2Fus.v-cdn.net%2F6038601%2Fuploads%2FIODNVI4RRZAW%2Fimage.png" rel="nofollow noopener ugc" target="_blank">
            <img src="https://us.v-cdn.net/6038601/uploads/IODNVI4RRZAW/image.png" alt="image.png" height="394" width="656" data-display-size="medium" data-float="none" data-type="image/png" data-embed-type="image" srcset="https://us.v-cdn.net/cdn-cgi/image/quality=80, format=auto, fit=scale-down, height=300, width=300/6038601/uploads/IODNVI4RRZAW/image.png 300w, https://us.v-cdn.net/cdn-cgi/image/quality=80, format=auto, fit=scale-down, height=600, width=600/6038601/uploads/IODNVI4RRZAW/image.png 600w, https://us.v-cdn.net/cdn-cgi/image/quality=80, format=auto, fit=scale-down, height=800, width=800/6038601/uploads/IODNVI4RRZAW/image.png 800w, https://us.v-cdn.net/cdn-cgi/image/quality=80, format=auto, fit=scale-down, height=1200, width=1200/6038601/uploads/IODNVI4RRZAW/image.png 1200w, https://us.v-cdn.net/cdn-cgi/image/quality=80, format=auto, fit=scale-down, height=1600, width=1600/6038601/uploads/IODNVI4RRZAW/image.png 1600w, https://us.v-cdn.net/cdn-cgi/image/quality=80, format=auto, fit=scale-down, height=2000, width=2000/6038601/uploads/IODNVI4RRZAW/image.png 2000w, https://us.v-cdn.net/6038601/uploads/IODNVI4RRZAW/image.png" sizes="100vw" /></a>
    </span>
</span>
<h3 data-id="protocol">Protocol</h3><div><table><colgroup><col /><col /><col /></colgroup><tr><th><p>Detail</p></th><th><p>Value</p></th></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Scanner</strong></p></td><td><p>NAEOTOM Alpha</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Scan mode</strong></p></td><td><p>QuantumPlus</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Tube voltage [kV]</strong></p></td><td><p>120 kV</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Rotation time [s]</strong></p></td><td><p>0.25 for combined thorax/abdominal CT; </p><p>0.5 for abdominal CT only</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Collimation</strong></p></td><td><p>144 × 0.40 mm</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>IQ level</strong></p></td><td><p>145</p><p>optimized for soft tissue with contrast</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Tube current modulation</strong></p></td><td><p>CARE Dose 4D</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>CTDIvol [mGy]</strong></p></td><td><p>7.4 ± 2.2</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Standard reconstruction</strong></p></td><td><p>VMI at 60 keV</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Secondary reconstruction</strong></p></td><td><p>VMI at 55 keV from spectral post-processing</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Slice thickness / increment</strong></p></td><td><p>3 mm / 2 mm</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Kernel</strong></p></td><td><p>Br40</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Iterative reconstruction</strong></p></td><td><p>Level 3</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>SPP reconstruction thickness / increment</strong></p></td><td><p>2 mm / 1.5 mm</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>SPP kernel</strong></p></td><td><p>Qr40</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Contrast agent</strong></p></td><td><p>Ultravist 300 mgI/mL or Ultravist 370 mgI/mL</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Injection access</strong></p></td><td><p>18-, 20-, or 22-gauge needle</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Scan timing</strong></p></td><td><p>Approximately 70 s after injection</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Contrast dosing factor</strong></p></td><td><p>0.30 g I/kg</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Injection duration</strong></p></td><td><p>30 s</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Protocol basis</strong></p></td><td><p>TBW-adapted CM protocol tailored to VMI at 60 keV</p></td></tr></table></div><p>Hoeijmakers EJI, Stammen L, Wildberger JE, et al. <strong>PCD-CT enables contrast media reduction in abdominal imaging compared to an individualized kV-adapted contrast media injection protocol on EID-CT.</strong> <em>Eur J Radiol.</em> 2024;179:111680.</p>]]>
        </description>
    </item>
    <item>
        <title>(2024) Woeltjen | Low-keV VMI improves conspicuity on PCCT for pancreatic cancer</title>
        <link>https://connect.siemens-healthineers.com/ja/discussion/343/2024-woeltjen-low-kev-vmi-improves-conspicuity-on-pcct-for-pancreatic-cancer</link>
        <pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2026 11:38:49 +0000</pubDate>
        <category>Publication protocols</category>
        <dc:creator>Daniel Stromer</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">343@/ja/discussions</guid>
        <description><![CDATA[<div><div><p>Mono40 keV images provided the best pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma conspicuity on PCCT in both arterial and portal venous phases.</p><p></p><p>Quantitatively, tumor-parenchyma attenuation difference and CNR were highest at 40 keV and decreased stepwise with rising keV.</p><p></p><p>Readers still preferred polyenergetic images for overall image quality and lowest perceived noise, despite better lesion conspicuity on low-keV VMI.</p></div></div><p><a href="https://connect.siemens-healthineers.com/ja/home/leaving?allowTrusted=1&amp;target=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ejradiology.com%2Farticle%2FS0720-048X%2824%2900090-1%2Ffulltext" rel="nofollow noopener ugc" role="button">Access publication</a></p><span data-embedjson="{&quot;url&quot;:&quot;https:\/\/us.v-cdn.net\/6038601\/uploads\/SY4HMBZH2EW3\/image.png&quot;,&quot;name&quot;:&quot;image.png&quot;,&quot;type&quot;:&quot;image\/png&quot;,&quot;size&quot;:280370,&quot;width&quot;:711,&quot;height&quot;:376,&quot;displaySize&quot;:&quot;large&quot;,&quot;float&quot;:&quot;none&quot;,&quot;downloadUrl&quot;:&quot;https:\/\/connect.siemens-healthineers.com\/api\/v2\/media\/download-by-url?url=https%3A%2F%2Fus.v-cdn.net%2F6038601%2Fuploads%2FSY4HMBZH2EW3%2Fimage.png&quot;,&quot;active&quot;:true,&quot;mediaID&quot;:1274,&quot;dateInserted&quot;:&quot;2026-04-10T11:34:28+00:00&quot;,&quot;insertUserID&quot;:14,&quot;foreignType&quot;:&quot;embed&quot;,&quot;foreignID&quot;:&quot;14&quot;,&quot;embedType&quot;:&quot;image&quot;,&quot;embedStyle&quot;:&quot;rich_embed_card&quot;}">
    <span>
        <a href="https://connect.siemens-healthineers.com/ja/home/leaving?allowTrusted=1&amp;target=https%3A%2F%2Fus.v-cdn.net%2F6038601%2Fuploads%2FSY4HMBZH2EW3%2Fimage.png" rel="nofollow noopener ugc" target="_blank">
            <img src="https://us.v-cdn.net/6038601/uploads/SY4HMBZH2EW3/image.png" alt="image.png" height="376" width="711" data-display-size="large" data-float="none" data-type="image/png" data-embed-type="image" srcset="https://us.v-cdn.net/cdn-cgi/image/quality=80, format=auto, fit=scale-down, height=300, width=300/6038601/uploads/SY4HMBZH2EW3/image.png 300w, https://us.v-cdn.net/cdn-cgi/image/quality=80, format=auto, fit=scale-down, height=600, width=600/6038601/uploads/SY4HMBZH2EW3/image.png 600w, https://us.v-cdn.net/cdn-cgi/image/quality=80, format=auto, fit=scale-down, height=800, width=800/6038601/uploads/SY4HMBZH2EW3/image.png 800w, https://us.v-cdn.net/cdn-cgi/image/quality=80, format=auto, fit=scale-down, height=1200, width=1200/6038601/uploads/SY4HMBZH2EW3/image.png 1200w, https://us.v-cdn.net/cdn-cgi/image/quality=80, format=auto, fit=scale-down, height=1600, width=1600/6038601/uploads/SY4HMBZH2EW3/image.png 1600w, https://us.v-cdn.net/cdn-cgi/image/quality=80, format=auto, fit=scale-down, height=2000, width=2000/6038601/uploads/SY4HMBZH2EW3/image.png 2000w, https://us.v-cdn.net/6038601/uploads/SY4HMBZH2EW3/image.png" sizes="100vw" /></a>
    </span>
</span>
<p><strong>Figure 4.</strong> PCCT images of the pancreas with a superior mesenteric artery encasing PDAC in arterial (A–C) and portal venous (D–F) contrast phase. A and D are polyenergetic reconstructions. B and E are monoenergetic reconstructions at 40 keV. C and F are monoenergetic reconstructions at 70 keV.</p><p>Source: Woeltjen et al., <em>European Journal of Radiology</em>, 2024</p><p></p><h3 data-id="protocol">Protocol</h3><p></p><div><table><colgroup><col /><col /><col /></colgroup><tr><th><p>Detail</p></th><th><p>Value</p></th></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Scanner</strong></p></td><td><p>NAEOTOM Alpha</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Scan mode</strong></p></td><td><p>QuantumPlus</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Tube voltage [kVp]</strong></p></td><td><p>120–140</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Slice collimation</strong></p></td><td><p>144 × 0.4 mm</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Tube current modulation</strong></p></td><td><p>CARE Dose4D</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>IQ level</strong></p></td><td><p>170</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Pitch</strong></p></td><td><p>0.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Rotation time [s]</strong></p></td><td><p>0.5</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>CTDIvol [mGy]</strong></p></td><td><p>8.1 ± 2.5 mGy arterial</p><p>7.7 ± 1.9 mGy portal venous</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Doselength product [mGy*cm]</strong></p></td><td><p>209.8 ± 78.9 arterial</p><p>443.2 ± 149.5 portal venous</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Contrast agent</strong></p></td><td><p>ACCUPAQUE 300</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Contrast dose</strong></p></td><td><p>1 mL/kg</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Injection flow</strong></p></td><td><p>4 mL/s for initial diagnostic scans; 2.5 mL/s for follow-up venous-only scans</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Bolus trigger</strong></p></td><td><p>ROI in descending aorta, threshold 100</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Arterial delay</strong></p></td><td><p>7 s after threshold</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Venous delay</strong></p></td><td><p>60 s after threshold</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Post-processing software</strong></p></td><td><p>Syngo.Via VB60</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>VMI range</strong></p></td><td><p>40–70 keV in 5 keV steps</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Polyenergetic kernel</strong></p></td><td><p>Br36</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Spectral</strong></p></td><td><p>40 keV images</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>VMI kernel</strong></p></td><td><p>Qr36</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Iterative reconstruction</strong></p></td><td><p>Quantum iterative reconstruction Q4</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Slice thickness / increment</strong></p></td><td><p>1.0 mm / 0.6 mm</p></td></tr></table></div><p>Woeltjen MM, Niehoff JH, Roggel R, et al. <strong>Pancreatic cancer in photon-counting CT: Low keV virtual monoenergetic images improve tumor conspicuity.</strong> <em>Eur J Radiol.</em> 2024;173:111374.</p>]]>
        </description>
    </item>
    <item>
        <title>(2023) Becker | Abdominal PCCT: general image quality and dose exposure</title>
        <link>https://connect.siemens-healthineers.com/ja/discussion/342/2023-becker-abdominal-pcct-general-image-quality-and-dose-exposure</link>
        <pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2026 11:25:03 +0000</pubDate>
        <category>Publication protocols</category>
        <dc:creator>Daniel Stromer</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">342@/ja/discussions</guid>
        <description><![CDATA[<div><div><p>In this first clinical routine experience, abdominal PCCT achieved superior overall image quality versus conventional CT, with higher Likert scores for general image quality, lower perceived noise, and fewer artifacts.</p><p></p><p>Objective image quality was also better with PCCT, with significantly higher SNR in fat, muscle, and air, but this came at the cost of higher radiation exposure in the initial manufacturer-default protocol.</p><p></p><p>In an ex vivo phantom study, the higher PCCT dose was accompanied by more DNA double-strand break foci than conventional CT, highlighting the need for protocol optimization before routine abdominal PCCT can be considered dose-efficient.</p></div></div><p><a href="https://connect.siemens-healthineers.com/ja/home/leaving?allowTrusted=1&amp;target=https%3A%2F%2Flink.springer.com%2Farticle%2F10.1007%2Fs00330-022-09278-1" rel="nofollow noopener ugc" role="button">Access publication</a></p><span data-embedjson="{&quot;url&quot;:&quot;https:\/\/us.v-cdn.net\/6038601\/uploads\/QFXDCRAUJYNS\/image.png&quot;,&quot;name&quot;:&quot;image.png&quot;,&quot;type&quot;:&quot;image\/png&quot;,&quot;size&quot;:2048031,&quot;width&quot;:2052,&quot;height&quot;:1152,&quot;displaySize&quot;:&quot;medium&quot;,&quot;float&quot;:&quot;none&quot;,&quot;downloadUrl&quot;:&quot;https:\/\/connect.siemens-healthineers.com\/api\/v2\/media\/download-by-url?url=https%3A%2F%2Fus.v-cdn.net%2F6038601%2Fuploads%2FQFXDCRAUJYNS%2Fimage.png&quot;,&quot;active&quot;:true,&quot;mediaID&quot;:1272,&quot;dateInserted&quot;:&quot;2026-04-10T11:21:08+00:00&quot;,&quot;insertUserID&quot;:14,&quot;foreignType&quot;:&quot;embed&quot;,&quot;foreignID&quot;:&quot;14&quot;,&quot;embedType&quot;:&quot;image&quot;,&quot;embedStyle&quot;:&quot;rich_embed_card&quot;}">
    <span>
        <a href="https://connect.siemens-healthineers.com/ja/home/leaving?allowTrusted=1&amp;target=https%3A%2F%2Fus.v-cdn.net%2F6038601%2Fuploads%2FQFXDCRAUJYNS%2Fimage.png" rel="nofollow noopener ugc" target="_blank">
            <img src="https://us.v-cdn.net/6038601/uploads/QFXDCRAUJYNS/image.png" alt="image.png" height="1152" width="2052" data-display-size="medium" data-float="none" data-type="image/png" data-embed-type="image" srcset="https://us.v-cdn.net/cdn-cgi/image/quality=80, format=auto, fit=scale-down, height=300, width=300/6038601/uploads/QFXDCRAUJYNS/image.png 300w, https://us.v-cdn.net/cdn-cgi/image/quality=80, format=auto, fit=scale-down, height=600, width=600/6038601/uploads/QFXDCRAUJYNS/image.png 600w, https://us.v-cdn.net/cdn-cgi/image/quality=80, format=auto, fit=scale-down, height=800, width=800/6038601/uploads/QFXDCRAUJYNS/image.png 800w, https://us.v-cdn.net/cdn-cgi/image/quality=80, format=auto, fit=scale-down, height=1200, width=1200/6038601/uploads/QFXDCRAUJYNS/image.png 1200w, https://us.v-cdn.net/cdn-cgi/image/quality=80, format=auto, fit=scale-down, height=1600, width=1600/6038601/uploads/QFXDCRAUJYNS/image.png 1600w, https://us.v-cdn.net/cdn-cgi/image/quality=80, format=auto, fit=scale-down, height=2000, width=2000/6038601/uploads/QFXDCRAUJYNS/image.png 2000w, https://us.v-cdn.net/6038601/uploads/QFXDCRAUJYNS/image.png" sizes="100vw" /></a>
    </span>
</span>
<p><strong>Figure 3.</strong> Example of axial and coronal reconstruction of abdominal conventional CT (A and C) and PCCT (B and D) for the depiction of subjective image impression. DLP was 413.38 and 453.98 mGy*cm for PCCT and conventional CT, respectively. Both examinations were rated “very good” by all examiners (general image quality PCCT: 4.75 ± 0.5; general image quality conventional CT: 4.75 ± 0.5)</p><p>Source: Becker et al., <em>European Radiology</em>, 2023</p><p></p><h3 data-id="protocol">Protocol</h3><div><table><colgroup><col /><col /><col /></colgroup><tr><th><p>Detail</p></th><th><p>Value</p></th></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Scanner</strong></p></td><td><p>NAEOTOM Alpha</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Exam type</strong></p></td><td><p>QuantumPlus</p><p>Single-phase contrast-enhanced abdominal CT, portal venous phase</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Tube voltage</strong></p></td><td><p>120 kV</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>PCCT collimation</strong></p></td><td><p>144 × 0.4 mm</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Rotation time</strong></p></td><td><p>0.5 s</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Pitch</strong></p></td><td><p>0.8</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Reconstruction</strong></p></td><td><p>Axial 1 mm Br40, coronal 3 mm Br40, sagittal 3 mm Br60</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Reconstruction algorithm</strong></p></td><td><p>QIR</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>mAs preset</strong></p></td><td><p>IQ145</p><p>145 mAs at 120 kV</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Mean Doselength product</strong></p></td><td><p>DLP 419.2 ± 162.2 mGy·cm</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Effective dose</strong></p></td><td><p>5.00 ± 1.95 mSv</p></td></tr></table></div><p>Becker BV, Kaatsch HL, Nestler K, et al. <strong>Initial experience on abdominal photon-counting computed tomography in clinical routine: general image quality and dose exposure.</strong> <em>Eur Radiol.</em> 2023;33:2461-2468.</p>]]>
        </description>
    </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
